Machine learning-assisted prediction of pneumonia based on non-invasive measures
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22089449 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Clement Yaw Effah (0000-0002-9095-4558, Zhengzhou University), Ruoqi Miao (Zhengzhou University), Emmanuel Kwateng Drokow (0000-0002-7363-9281, Zhengzhou University), Clement Agboyibor (0000-0002-2519-9146, Zhengzhou University), Ruiping Qiao (First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University), Yongjun Wu (0000-0002-1212-6511, Zhengzhou University, corresponding author), Lijun Miao (0000-0002-7778-6908, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, corresponding author), Yanbin Wang (0000-0002-4331-3192, Taiyuan Iron and Steel Group (China), corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Pages | 938801-938801 |
| Publication date | 2022-07-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.938801 |
| PMID | 35968461 |
| OpenAlex | W4288447278 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 42 |
Background: non-invasive measures such as physical and laboratory parameters is gaining momentum and has been proposed to decrease diagnostic uncertainty associated with bacterial pneumonia. Herein, this study conducted several experiments using eight machine learning models to predict pneumonia based on biomarkers, laboratory parameters, and physical features. Methods: We perform machine-learning analysis on 535 different patients, each with 45 features. Data normalization to rescale all real-valued features was performed. Since it is a binary problem, we categorized each patient into one class at a time. We designed three experiments to evaluate the models: (1) feature selection techniques to select appropriate features for the models, (2) experiments on the imbalanced original dataset, and (3) experiments on the SMOTE data. We then compared eight machine learning models to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting pneumonia. Results: Biomarkers such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin demonstrated the most significant discriminating power. Ensemble machine learning models such as RF (accuracy = 92.0%, precision = 91.3%, recall = 96.0%, f1-Score = 93.6%) and XGBoost (accuracy = 90.8%, precision = 92.6%, recall = 92.3%, f1-score = 92.4%) achieved the highest performance accuracy on the original dataset with AUCs of 0.96 and 0.97, respectively. On the SMOTE dataset, RF and XGBoost achieved the highest prediction results with f1-scores of 92.0 and 91.2%, respectively. Also, AUC of 0.97 was achieved for both RF and XGBoost models. Conclusions: Our models showed that in the diagnosis of pneumonia, individual clinical history, laboratory indicators, and symptoms do not have adequate discriminatory power. We can also conclude that the ensemble ML models performed better in this study
Machine learning · Pneumonia · Computer Science · COVID-19 diagnosis using AI · Machine Learning in Healthcare · Medicine · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment · Artificial Intelligence · Internal Medicine
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |