Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A qualitative interview study exploring barriers and facilitators to uptake of measles vaccination among healthcare workers at a London hospital

Bibliographic Data

ID22090972
AuthorsNikki Heinze (0000-0003-4529-3460, King's College London, corresponding author), Louise Smith (0000-0002-1277-2564, Office of Readiness and Response), Louise E Smith, Carmel Curtis (King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust), Dale Weston (0000-0001-5304-7572, Office of Readiness and Response), Jasmin Islam (0000-0002-4369-6306, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust), G James Rubin (0000-0002-4440-0570, King's College London)
Year2025
Volume13
Pages1621699-1621699
Publication date2025-09-26
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2025.1621699
PMID41080861
OpenAlexW4414551388
LanguageEN
References cited43

Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCW) are at increased risk of measles due to their occupational exposure. Yet, there is evidence of low vaccination rates, inadequate immunity among this group, and many do not know their vaccination status. The aim of this qualitative study is to explore barriers and facilitators to measles vaccination and reasons why some HCW do not know their vaccination status. Methods: We conducted 23 online semi-structured interviews with HCW recruited from a teaching hospital in London. HCW were eligible to participate if they had direct patient contact, had not had measles, and were either (a) unsure of their vaccination status, (b) unvaccinated, (c) partially vaccinated, or (d) vaccinated after joining the hospital. We used framework analysis to identify themes and subthemes. Results: Facilitators to measles vaccination included protection of self and others, being prompted and pragmatic considerations such as being required to be vaccinated for work. Barriers included the accessibility of vaccination, concerns about vaccine safety, and low perceived risk of and from measles. Fractured vaccination records and a lack of perceived importance of measles vaccination may contribute to some HCW not knowing their vaccination status. Conclusion: Making vaccination accessible, increasing knowledge and awareness of measles and measles vaccination, and prompting those who require vaccination may support vaccination decisions. A central, easy-to-access App or portal which sends reminders for boosters may reduce the number of HCW who are unsure of their vaccination status

Health care · Immunization · Measles · Measles vaccine · Qualitative research · Vaccination · Immune responses and vaccinations · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Virology and Viral Diseases

  • Analyzing Qualitative Data

    Alan Bryman, Bob Burgess•Analyzing Qualitative Data•2002

  • Beyond confidence

    Open Access•Cornelia Betsch, Peter Schmid et al.•PLoS ONE•2018

  • Thematic analysis

    Victoria Clarke, Braun•The Journal of Positive Psychology•2017

  • The behaviour change wheel

    Open Access•Susan Michie, Maartje M Van Stralen et al.•Implementation Science•2011

  • Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research

    Open Access•Monique Hennink, Bruno Van Swinderen et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2022

  • Mandatory seasonal influenza vaccination or masking of British Columbia health care workers

    Open Access•Doran Ksienski, Doran S Ksienski•Canadian Journal of Public Health•2014

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae