Desegregation Rulings and Public Attitude Changes

White Resistance or Resignation

Bibliographic Data

ID2209219
AuthorsCardell K Jacobson (corresponding author)
Year1978
Volume84
Issue3
Pages698-705
Publication date1978-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-9602 • E-ISSN: 1537-5390
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/226833
OpenAlexW2039036918
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited2

Two opposing theoretical arguments about the effect of court rulings on public attitudes are developed and tested using data collected before and after a desegregation ruling in Milwaukee. The social-adjustment argument is supported quite strongly. Parents of children in the public schools became more supportive of integration and busing on several different measures. On the other hand, people without children in the schools became more resistant, and parents of children in parochial schools showed the most negative attitude change. The proximity-resistance argument predicts that more resistance will occur in specific situations than in general situations and that most resistance will occur among those most affected by the decision. No support was found for this argument. The implications of the results are discussed briefly

Argument (complex analysis) · Desegregation · Political science · Racial integration · Resistance (ecology) · White (mutation) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOI