Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Testing language models’ syntactic sensitivity to grammatical constraints

A case study of wanna contraction

Bibliographic Data

ID22092390
AuthorsKangsan Noh (Korea University), Eunjeong Oh (Sangmyung University, corresponding author), Sanghoun Song (0000-0002-4234-232X, Korea University)
Year2024
Volume9
Publication date2024-12-19
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Communication (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2297-900X • E-ISSN: 2297-900X
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fcomm.2024.1442093
OpenAlexW4405609191
LanguageEN
References cited18

Wanna contraction refers to the reduction of want to to wanna . Interestingly, native English speakers contract want to in object extraction questions but not in subject extraction questions. The present study investigated whether language models such as bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) adhere to this grammatical subtlety. Wanna contraction involves two factors: subject–object asymmetry and contraction. Disentangling these two ensures that when language models accurately identify illicit instances of wanna contraction, the detection stems from their understanding of the contraction, rather than the intervention by subject–object asymmetry. For this objective, we conducted three independent experiments. We tested whether language models detect illicit cases of contraction by maintaining constant contraction (Experiment 1) and question types (Experiment 2). We predicted that higher surprisal values would be assigned to ungrammatical instances. The overall results of the two experiments were in line with our prediction (87.5 and 75%, respectively). In addition, the analysis of by-word surprisal also indicates that the models generate higher surprisal values for subject extraction questions in illicit wanna instances (Experiment 3). Thus, the models’ processing patterns of wanna contraction turn out to be close to those of native English speakers, suggesting their role as a research tool in linguistic experiments

Grammar · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Computer Science · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence

  • Parsing Effects in Second Language Sentence Processing

    Open Access•Alan Juffs, Michael Harrington•Studies in Second Language…•1995

  • Rules and representations

    Open Access•Noam Chomsky•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1980

  • Expectation-based syntactic comprehension

    Open Access•Roger Levy•Cognition•2008

  • Syntactic Structures

    Noam Chomsky•Syntactic Structures•1957

  • Syntactic Structure from Deep Learning

    Tal Linzen, Mario Baroni•Annual Review of Linguistics•2020

  • Acquisition of the constraints on wanna contraction by advanced second language learners

    Open Access•Soo-Ok Kweon, Robert Bley‐vroman et al.•Second language Research•2011

  • Investigating “wanna” contraction through an emergentist approach among Iranian EFL learners applying usage-based model of language acquisition

    Open Access•Mehrdad Rezaeian, Firooz Sadighi et al.•Lingua•2017

  • Want-to contraction in second language acquisition

    Open Access•William O’grady, Michiko Nakamura et al.•Lingua•2008

  • Global Rules

    George Lakoff•Language•1970

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae