Natural Stings
Selling Distrust About Vaccines on Brazilian YouTube
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22093610 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dayane Fumiyo Tokojima Machado (0000-0003-1437-9210, Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education, corresponding author), Alexandre Fioravante de Siqueira (0000-0003-1320-4347, Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education), Leda Maria Caira Gitahy (0000-0002-8027-126X, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2297-900X • E-ISSN: 2297-900X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fcomm.2020.577941 |
| OpenAlex | W3096740884 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 50 |
In this study, we investigate YouTube’s videos related to vaccines to understand the particularities of the opposition to vaccines in Brazil. The World Health Organization considered vaccine hesitation as one of the greatest threats to global health in 2019. Researchers associated this hesitation to a strengthening of the anti-vaccination movements, suggesting that social media is currently the main spreader of this position. YouTube increasingly becomes a matter of concern, since its recommendation system is identified as a promoter of misinformation and extreme content. Despite YouTube’s statements, misinformation and disinformation (M&D) about vaccines continue to be disseminated in videos in Portuguese, reaching a large audience. We found 52 videos containing M&D about vaccines. The main M&D were the claim of dangerous ingredients in vaccines, the defense of self-direction — freedom of choice, independent research —, the promotion of alternative health services, the myth that vaccines cause diseases, conspiracy theories, and the allegation of vaccine’s severe collateral effects. We identified 39 brands advertising on 13 videos of our M&D sample. Although the YouTube Partner Program is an important source of income, the channels use different economic strategies, such as the selling of courses, and therapies and the use of fundraising platforms. We also found that alternative health channels spread distrust about traditional institutions to promote themselves as trusted sources for the audience and thereby profit with alternative health services
Advertising · Business · Distrust · Internet privacy · Misinformation · Political science · Public relations · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Teorias da conspiração sobre vacinas contra o Coronavírus
Youtube as a Source of Information About Unproven Drugs for Covid-19
Infodemia e Instagram
Early Treatment”, Anti-Vaccination, and Denialism
Tratamento precoce”, antivacinação e negacionismo
The political economy of digital profiteering
Why Should Scientists be on YouTube? It’s all About Bamboo, Oil and Ice Cream
Exposure to Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Is as Impactful as Vaccine Misinformation in Inducing a Decline in Vaccination Intentions in New Zealand
Drivers of vaccine mis/disinformation in the media
It-which-must-not-be-named
Malicious creativity in Telegram’s (software) anti-vaccination ecosystem
From Facebook to YouTube
SciPy 1.0
The Influence of Narrative v. Statistical Information on Perceiving Vaccination Risks
Science and Environmental Communication on YouTube
Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement
The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views
Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm – An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement
Array programming with NumPy
Matplotlib
A postmodern Pandora's box
Gephi
Mapping the anti-vaccination movement on Facebook
Immunized against science
Understanding Conspiracy Theories
The social consequences of conspiracism
Vaccine confidence and hesitancy in Brazil
Parent psychology and the decision to delay childhood vaccination
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |