The TikTok ban in Albania across the policy cycle
Framing, legitimation, and rollback in mediated discourse
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22094064 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lorena Liçenji (0009-0000-8866-8504, American University of the Middle East, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-03 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2297-900X • E-ISSN: 2297-900X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fcomm.2026.1847142 |
| OpenAlex | W7163426645 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 23 |
Platform bans are high-stakes interventions in communication infrastructure, yet scholarship still knows relatively little about how their public meaning changes across a full policy cycle. This article examines Albanian mediated discourse on the TikTok ban across three policy-cycle phases: announcement, enforcement, and rollback. Analysis is based on a qualitatively driven mixed-method content analysis of 240 items from 11 outlets, with a main analytic sample of 235 items after deduplication and a 201-item robustness sample. Items were coded for stance toward the ban, actor voice, primary frame, legitimation cues, and remedy constructions. The findings show a clear policy-cycle shift. The announcement phase is dominated by safety and child-protection framing and by supportive coverage. The enforcement phase is marked by greater challenger visibility, stronger opposition to the ban, and a turn toward rights and governance framing. During rollback, coverage becomes government-centered again, but the policy is reframed through governance, monitoring, conditional access, and platform-accountability language. Actor blocks strongly structure both framing and stance. At the descriptive level, authorization clusters with government discourse, while rollback discourse moves away from shutdown toward monitoring and platform-accountability cues. The article argues that platform bans are best understood as policy-cycle communication events, and that rollback operates not as simple retreat but as discursive re-legitimation
Corporate governance · Discourse analysis · Disinformation · Enforcement · Legitimation · Negotiation · Public discourse · Scholarship · Copyright and Intellectual Property · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Freedom of Expression and Defamation
Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice
The Hybrid Media System
The Platform Society
Legitimation in discourse and communication
Corpus-assisted analysis of legitimation strategies in government social media communication
State nationalism or popular nationalism? Analysing media coverage of TikTok ban on mainstream Indian TV news channels
Public Institutions Meet TikTok
Content Analysis in Mass Communication
Institutional and political communication on TikTok
Beyond the Ban
Digital Rights and the State of Exception. Internet Shutdowns from the Perspective of Just Securitization Theory
Twittering the News
Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook
Strategies of legitimization in political discourse
Media, digital sovereignty and geopolitics
What is platform governance
Framing
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
The Platformization of the Web
| Highly cited | No |
|---|