Two Public Health Crises, Two Narratives
An Analysis of How Policymakers Have Managed British Columbia's Covid-19 Pandemic and Potential Implications for the Ongoing Overdose Crisis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22094071 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrea Burton (0000-0003-2203-815X, Government of Canada, corresponding author), Brenda Sawatzky-Girling (Providence Health Care), Jordan Westfall |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2297-900X • E-ISSN: 2297-900X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fcomm.2022.781564 |
| OpenAlex | W4281707894 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 23 |
Canadians take great pride in their social values such as human and civil rights, universal health care and good government. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, federal and provincial leadership teams forged new partnerships via shared focus, voluntariness, jurisdictional respect, and lowering of barriers. In our analysis focusing on the Province of British Columbia, we compare and contrast how leadership and politics have impacted the response to COVID-19 vs. the response to B.C.'s concurrent public health emergency, the overdose crisis. We argue that these dual epidemics are framed differently in the public discourse, and that a significant disparity emerges in how the two public health emergencies have been handled at every level of government. We further posit that constructing the narrative around a communicable disease outbreak such as COVID-19 is easier than for the overdose crisis, in large part because COVID-19 impacts every person whereas the overdose crisis is perceived to have a narrow impact on the population. We use three key communications indicators in our analysis: a) the primary groups that messaging from leadership needed to reach; b) the programs and initiatives that leadership needed to ensure receive broad dissemination; and c) the messaging and tone required to achieve the desired impact to encourage societal change. On the basis of our analysis, we conclude that Canada needs to be better at building the types of supports it has created to manage the COVID-19 crisis in order to also support individuals who are immersed in the overdose crisis. Many of the policy and communication decisions and insights learned through the COVID-19 pandemic can, and ought to, be put into effect to mitigate the ongoing overdose crisis in B.C. and beyond. Examples include: consistent messaging that emphasizes respect for all and reflects determination from our political leaders as they work together to change the narrative and enact policy change. COVID-19 has shown us that if we are determined and focused, even if we occasionally run into obstacles, we can move the dial forward to mitigate—and perhaps even eliminate—a health crisis
Crisis communication · Crisis management · Disease · Environmental health · Pandemic · Political science · Politics · Population · Public health · Public relations · Community Health and Development · Crime, Deviance, and Social Control · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Public Administration · Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canada's universal health-care system
“When You're Getting High… You Just Don't Want to Be Around Anybody.” A Qualitative Exploration of Reasons for Injecting Alone
Folk Devils and Moral Panics
The pedagogy of disgust
Like being put on an ice floe and shoved away”
Changes in substance supply and use characteristics among people who use drugs (PWUD) during the Covid-19 global pandemic
Losing the uphill battle? Emergent harm reduction interventions and barriers during the opioid overdose crisis in Canada
Re-visioning Public Health Ethics
Moral Panic
How behavioural science data helps mitigate the Covid-19 crisis
True Patriot Love
Deep culture in action
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |