The Meerut Trial (1929-33)

The historiography of the Meerut Trial (1929-33) has regarded the Trial as a crackdown on the left-wing movement in India, notably a communist left. Those interested in global history have represented the Trial as a repressive response to revolutionary internationalism. The effects of the Trial have firmly structured the history of its causes. This paper revisits why the British colonial state in India launched the Trial in the first place. For the British colonial state, anxiety about Bolshevism was not new. Many historians and activists have considered the Trial a teleological culmination of a series of conspiracy cases against communism. Notwithstanding its merit, it effaces the importance of the historical conjuncture of 1928-9. This paper argues that what forced the state to launch the Trial in 1928-9 was the unprecedented industrial unrest in the two cities of Bombay and Calcutta. At the face of a labor movement that challenged capitalism and colonialism alike, the state felt that repressive legal-administrative actions alone were insufficient for control and order. In its broader sense, the Trial was a cold war propaganda response of the British state in India to manufacture the consent of its subjects

Capitalism · Colonialism · Communism · Economic history · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Unrest · Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies · History · Indian Economic and Social Development · Law

• The Politics of the Urban Poor in Early Twentieth-Century India

  Open Access•Nandini Gooptu•The politics of the urban poor in…•2001

  Add to list

• The Bolshevik Menace

  Open Access•Suchetana Chattopadhyay•South Asia Research•2006

  Add to list

• Manufacturing consent

  Edward S Herman, John Pruden et al.•La fabrication du consentement :…•1988

  Add to list

• Race, Nationality, Mobility

  Radhika Viyas Mongia, Radhika Mongia•Public Culture•1999

  Add to list