The Montreux Convention After the Beginning of the Special Military Operation. Status Quo or Denunciation

Discourse of International Actors and Possible Geopolitical Implications for the Black Sea Region

Bibliographic Data

ID22098281
AuthorsOlga Aleksandrovna Moskalenko (0000-0002-4162-3162, Sevastopol National Technical University), Georgiy L Muradov (0009-0001-2806-5821, Moscow State Institute of International Relations), Aleksandr A Irkhin (0000-0001-7895-550X, Sevastopol National Technical University), Natalia E Demeshko (0000-0002-9620-2410, Sevastopol National Technical University), Kirill I Nagornyak (0000-0003-0075-1405, Sevastopol National Technical University)
Year2023
Volume23
Issue4
Pages643-661
Publication date2023-12-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueVestnik RUDN International Relations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2313-0660 • E-ISSN: 2313-0679
PublisherPeoples' Friendship University of Russia (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.22363/2313-0660-2023-23-4-643-661
OpenAlexW4390922384
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited9

The mode of operation of the Black Sea or Turkish straits is again becoming a matter of international discussion following the clash of two globalization projects: the American Greater Black Sea region and the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative, as well as Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine, which is primarily realized on the ground. Being the Black Sea straits a core object of international agreements between the World War I and the World War II, the Montreux Convention of 1936 secured the Black Sea from major naval clashes and accidents. The Convention, which is more than 85 years old, has the longest regime for regulating the passage of military and civilian ships through the Black Sea straits since 1783 and has reflected the geopolitical reality, in which the Black Sea littoral powers, which have been Türkiye and Russia for 240 years, have noticeable advantages over the navies of non-littoral powers. This provision contradicts the modern American aspirations to open the Black Sea region and the Black Sea - Caspian space for the military-political expansion of the United States and the coalition. The purpose of the article is to determine, on the basis of a discursive analysis, the goal-setting of the main geopolitical actors in relation to the Montreux Convention and to predict the possible transformations of the Black Sea region, which has become the center of a clash of interests of global and regional powers. The research methodology is based on the principles of systemic and interdisciplinary approaches to provide a combination of methods of political linguistics and geopolitical analysis and synthesis. The article examines the discourse of the leading actors of international relations around the Montreux Convention following the special military operation, which makes it possible to identify its transformations between the status quo or denunciation at the level of conceptual discussions. Türkiye traditionally balances between the interests of Russia and the West due to the role of a neutral “gatekeeper” of the straits, technologically applying Article 19 of the Convention, which so far fully meets the interests of Russia; while the USA shows a tendency to revise the Convention or circumvent it legally. Therefore, the Montreux Convention will remain at the center of public and real politics until the end of the formation of a new system of international relations that should ensure the stability of the development of the world for the next political era

Black sea · Convention · Economy · Freedom of navigation · Geography · Geopolitics · International law · Law of the sea · Maritime boundary · Political science · Politics · Public international law · United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · Law · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics · Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation · Geology · Oceanography

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access