Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

“Informal” donation in reproduction

Risks and opportunities

Bibliographic Data

ID22098545
AuthorsE O Nidergaus (Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia Boris N. Yeltsin), Elena Nidergaus (0000-0002-9824-7575, Ural Federal University), Marina V Valeeva (0000-0003-1623-8067, Ural Federal University), Irina Polyakova (0000-0002-9619-2152, Ural Federal University), I G Polyakova (Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia Boris N. Yeltsin)
Year2024
Volume24
Issue3
Pages632-644
Publication date2024-10-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRUDN Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2313-2272 • E-ISSN: 2408-8897
PublisherPeoples' Friendship University of Russia (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.22363/2313-2272-2024-24-3-632-644
OpenAlexW4415521944
LanguageEN
References cited11

The article considers motivation of users of the “informal” sperm donation services and the new social phenomenon of ‘co-parenting’ which is defined in the sociological context as a new model of parenting - when a child is raised by two parents who are not in a traditional marriage. This new social phenomenon is associated with the spread of assisted reproductive technologies, in particular gamete donation, which allows infertile couples and single people to realize their reproductive rights. At the same time, ‘third’ parents (donors) can be involved in both giving birth and raising a child. Co-parenting creates new social relations and transforms traditional institutions of family and parenthood, raising questions about the legal status, rights and responsibilities of all participants, and about the impact of such a parenting model on socialization. In the contemporary society, the problem of infertility can be solved with new reproductive technologies: in addition to the traditional search for donors (through reproductive clinics), an alternative method has recently become widespread - the search for a donor of gametes (reproductive cells) on specialized websites. “Informal” gamete donation reflects deep social-cultural shifts in relation to reproductive technologies, which generates changes in parenting models, ethical norms, social attitudes and values. The authors conducted an empirical study, the object of which was the database of one such website (N=2960). This study allowed to present a social-demographic profile of the user of specialized Internet resources for finding a partner for joint childbirth in Russia, and the main motives of male donors and female recipients were identified. The results indicate the need for the improved access to formal donor programs and programs involving third parties in the parenting project, for the development of ethical standards regulating practices of “informal” sperm donation, and for further research to identify social, ethical and psychological consequences of “informal” sperm donation and effective strategies to eliminate negative consequences of this practice

Childbirth · Donation · Egg donation · Embryo donation · Organ donation · Phenomenon · Reproductive technology · Sperm donation · Blood donation and transfusion practices · Organ Donation and Transplantation · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • Lesbian couples' views about and experiences of not being able to choose their sperm donor

    An Ravelingien, Provoost et al.•Culture Health & Sexuality•2015

  • Assisted Reproduction in the Digital Age

    Open Access•Kevin Lavoie, Isabel Côté et al.•The Journal of Men s Studies•2017

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae