Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Old and new forms of communication between the state and society on the way to a new social contract

Bibliographic Data

ID22098649
AuthorsRoman I Anisimov (International Humanitarian University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume25
Issue1
Pages7-20
Publication date2025-04-04
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRUDN Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2313-2272 • E-ISSN: 2408-8897
PublisherPeoples' Friendship University of Russia (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.22363/2313-2272-2025-25-1-7-20
OpenAlexW4415520914
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited1

The article considers the concept of social contract as a consensus between the state and the people. Based on the works of T. Hobbes, D. Locke, J.-J. Rousseau, C. Montesquieu, German social thought, in the context of reflections on the “legitimacy” of R. Nozick, J. Rawls, M. Olson, A. Auzan, the author argues that social contract is consensual in nature and communication between the government and the people is necessary to develop such a consensus, focusing on public organizations and political parties as traditional conductors of the interests of the people in interactions with the state. Based on sociological studies, the author makes a conclusion about Russians’ low trust in political parties and non-participation in public organizations, which indicates that public organizations and political parties poorly represent the interests of citizens in interactions with the government. This situation is determined by the change in the type of society: the Russian society turns into more flexible and atomized, strong ties are replaced by weak ones (even the family as the most traditional institution goes through flexibilization and atomization). In these conditions, public organizations and political parties created in the previous period cease to be adequate intermediaries in the interaction between the authorities and the people, and new communication channels develop - Internet communities and direct appeals of citizens to government bodies. The Russian society actively interacts with the authorities in these forms but weakly in classical ones, which refutes the idea of the people as a passive subject, the spread of political absenteeism, the underdevelopment of civil society and public organizations as an expression of public interests and indicates the need to develop concepts that correspond to a new type of society

Civil society · Institution · Intermediary · Politics · Social contract · Economic Issues in Ukraine · European Union Policy and Governance · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Artificial sociality

    Open Access•V V Menshikov, V F Komarova•RUDN Journal of Sociology•2025

  • The Strength of Weak Ties

    Mark Granovetter, Mark S Granovetter•American Journal of Sociology•1973

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae