Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Sociological Response

Challenging the Modernity-centrism of Pierre Bourdieu’s Field Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID22105248
AuthorsOlga Zeveleva (0000-0002-7011-7736, Utrecht University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume12
Issue2
Pages333-342
Publication date2024-12-02
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Ancient History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2324-8106 • E-ISSN: 2324-8114
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/jah-2024-0020
OpenAlexW4405063710
LanguageEN
References cited17

This article is part of a special issue of the Journal of Ancient History , “Social Biographies of the Ancient World,” forming a sociological response to the other articles and case studies. It argues that engaging in discussions of Pierre Bourdieu’s field theory with historians of the Ancient Near East pushes us beyond the usual binaries that structure the social sciences. While working with and challenging binaries like ‘Western’ and ‘non-Western’ has become central for social scientists, the binary of the ‘modern’ and ‘pre-modern’ remains on the margins of theoretical debates in sociology. This contribution disentangles the common association of field theory with modernity. Turning the field approach towards the ancient Near East encourages us to ask questions about how far social theory exceptionalizes modernity, and whether theoretical constructs central to the social sciences actually reflect processes that predate modern history. This exercise invites scholars to consider whether the distinguishing feature of modernity is not the emergence of fields, as is commonly assumed, but rather the emergence of economic capital as primary. More broadly, a Bourdieusian analysis of the Ancient Near East encourages us to zoom out to a potential macro-historical field approach, and to reconsider field theory’s relation to time and space

Cultural capital · Epistemology · Habitus · Modernity · Social science · Social theory · Sociological theory · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Philosophy · Social and Cultural Dynamics · Sports, Gender, and Society

  • Culture and Ideology under the Seleukids

    Eva Anagnostou-Laoutides, Stefan Pfeiffer•Culture and Ideology under the…•2022

  • New Perspectives on Ancient Warfare

    Garrett Fagan, Matthew Trundle•New perspectives on ancient warfare•2010

  • Functional Differentiation in 1 Maccabees

    Rotem Avneri Meir, Jutta Jokiranta et al.•Journal of Ancient History•2024

  • The Frenzy of Fields

    Open Access•Neil Fligstein, D Vandebroeck•Irish Journal of Sociology•2014

  • News Media as a “Journalistic Field

    R Benson•Political Communication•2006

  • Habitus as Topic and Tool

    L Wacquant•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2011

  • The market of symbolic goods

    Open Access•Pierre Bourdieu•Poetics•1985

  • Intellectual field and creative project

    Open Access•Pierre Bourdieu•Social Science Information•1969

  • Hegel, Marx and Vygotsky

    Andy Blunden•Hegel, Marx and Vygotsky•2022

  • In Other Words

    Pierre Bourdieu•In Other Words•1990

  • Genèse et structure du champ religieux

    Pierre Bourdieu•Revue Française de Sociologie•1971

  • Pierre Bourdieu

    Open Access•F Lebaron•Theory and Society•2003

  • What Is Axial About the Axial Age

    Open Access•Robert N Bellah, Robert Ν Bellah•European Journal of Sociology•2005

  • The social space and the genesis of groups

    Open Access•Pierre Bourdieu•Social Science Information•1985

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae