Xenophon’s Memorabilia and Greek historiography. A comparative approach

Bibliographic Data

ID22105259
AuthorsMelina Tamiolaki (0000-0001-7215-4701, University of Crete, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume12
Issue1
Pages1-22
Publication date2024-05-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Ancient History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2324-8106 • E-ISSN: 2324-8114
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/jah-2021-0023
OpenAlexW4385809445
LanguageEN
References cited38

This paper proposes a comparison between Xenophon’s Memorabilia and Greek historiography, with the aim of further illuminating Xenophon’s literary techniques. I pursue this comparison in two parts: in the first part, I deal with the verbs ἤκουσα (“I heard”), ὁρῶ (“I see”), and οἶδα (“I know”) and the expression δοκεῖ μοι (“it seems to me”), examining their uses in Xenophon and his most important historiographical predecessors respectively (Herodotus and Thucydides); in the second part, I turn to the section about Critias and Alcibiades ( Mem. 1.2.12–48) and suggest some possible connections with Greek historiography. Throughout my analysis, I highlight both similarities and divergences between Xenophon’s techniques and certain historiographical methods and principles. I suggest that reading the Memorabilia in the light of Greek historiography enables a better evaluation of Xenophon’s literary techniques and that the manifold ways in which Xenophon evokes or differentiates himself from historiographical practices form part of an original apology

Ancient Greek · Archaeology · Art · Historiography · Literature · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Classics · Computer Science · History · Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access