Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Selection by Lot and Democracy

New Trend, Ancient Model

Bibliographic Data

ID22105486
AuthorsEphraim David (0000-0002-3582-4312, University of Haifa, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume10
Issue01
Pages7-20
Publication date2021-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAdvances in Historical Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2327-0438 • E-ISSN: 2327-0446
PublisherScientific Research Publishing, Inc. (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.4236/ahs.2021.101002
OpenAlexW3135205173
LanguageEN
References cited12

Though considered the most democratic method of allocating citizens to office in Classical Greece, sortition (selection by lot) has never been adopted on a large scale by modern democracies (except for juries) and has fallen into oblivion. Recently, however, some political theorists, motivated by deep disappointment with current electoral practices, have been advocating a return to sortition without being sufficiently aware of the complexities involved in their ancient Athenian model. This study tries to explain the roots and ideology of sortition, the ways in which it operated in Athens and the causes of its functional success there for almost two centuries. Proposals of returning to a similar system should pay due attention to the significant role played by elections alongside the lottery in Classical Athens and the precautions taken there to prevent possible harm. In my view, the optimal formula for reform would be a political compromise combining, in one way or another, elections with sortition among volunteering candidates from various quarters of the civic society, selected in due proportions so as to be statistically representative of the demos. Selection by lottery should apply only to groups of people (e.g., committees and councils)—never to individual magistrates

Democracy · Political science · Politics · Computer Science · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Economic Theory and Institutions · Law · Artificial Intelligence

  • Random Selection in Politics

    Lyn Carson, Brian Martins et al.•Random Selection in Politics•1999

  • La Cite Grecque

    G Glotz•The American Historical Review•1929

  • The Classical Athenian Democracy

    David Stockton, D L Stockton•The classical Athenian democracy•1990

  • Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens

    Josiah Ober•Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens•1989

  • From the Whole Citizen Body

    Claire Taylor•Hesperia The Journal of the…•2007

  • Democracy Through Multi-Body Sortition

    Open Access•Terrill G Bouricius•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2013

  • Sortition, its advocates and its critics

    Open Access•Vincent Jacquet, Christoph Niessen et al.•International Political Science…•2022

  • Choosing Electoral Systems

    Open Access•P Norris•International Political Science…•1997

  • Lot and Democratic Representation

    Open Access•Alex Zakaras•Constellations•2010

  • Random Assemblies for Lawmaking? Prospects and Limits

    Open Access•James S Fishkin, James Fishkin•Latin American Politics and Society•2018

  • From Deliberative to Radical Democracy? Sortition and Politics in the Twenty-First Century

    Open Access•Yves Sintomer•Latin American Politics and Society•2018

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae