Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cosmic

Leader-Driven Context-Oriented Collaboration Between Agents

Bibliographic Data

ID22106869
AuthorsVansh Vashishtha (0009-0003-8785-5983, Bennett University), Sonal Pandey (0000-0003-4770-9722, Bennett University), Yash Raj Singh (0009-0000-5836-792X, Bennett University), Arshdeep Bahga (0000-0003-4931-2796, Cloudemy Technology Labs, Chandigarh, India), Vijay K Madisetti (0000-0002-6539-6769, Georgia Institute of Technology)
Year2026
Volume13
Issue3
Pages3262-3287
Publication date2026-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2329-924X • E-ISSN: 2373-7476
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1109/tcss.2026.3661839
OpenAlexW7131842304
LanguageEN
References cited4

We present COSMIC, a leader-driven multiagent coordination framework that extends the AutoGen GroupChat paradigm to support more stable and context-consistent collaboration among large language model (LLM) agents. COSMIC introduces: 1) a leader agent that decomposes tasks and issues an explicit termination decision; 2) a shared rolling memory buffer that synchronizes recent context across agents; and 3) a speaker selector agent (SSA) that enforces structured turn-taking and mitigates self-invocation and speaker imbalance. Across six coordination-intensive tasks, COSMIC achieves 100% validity under task-specific hard-constraint criteria. On the five tasks where baseline frameworks produced validated outputs, COSMIC improves composite scores by 20.2%, 23.3%, 27.7%, 52.6%, and 46.9% over CrewAI Hierarchical, CrewAI Sequential, AutoGen, LangChain, and OpenAI Swarm, respectively. COSMIC reduces wall-clock time relative to CrewAI Hierarchical, CrewAI Sequential, AutoGen, and LangChain by 57.3%, 50.8%, 61.4%, and 77.6%, while incurring higher runtime than OpenAI Swarm due to richer coordination and memory overhead. On GSM8K, COSMIC attains $94\pm 1$ % accuracy, exceeding the sparse multiagent debate (MAD) configuration reported in a Google Research publication. Empirically, performance peaks around five agents, reflecting a trade-off between diversity and coordination overhead

COSMIC cancer database · Multi-agent system · Swarm behaviour · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae