Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Co-Activity Maximization in Online Social Networks

Bibliographic Data

ID22107490
AuthorsDongyu Mao (0000-0001-8366-2402, The University of Texas at Dallas), Weili Wu (0000-0001-8747-6340, The University of Texas at Dallas), Ding-Zhu Du (The University of Texas at Dallas), Ding‐Zhu Du (0000-0002-7345-2185, The University of Texas at Dallas)
Year2024
Volume11
Issue1
Pages66-75
Publication date2024-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2329-924X • E-ISSN: 2373-7476
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1109/tcss.2022.3213260
OpenAlexW4312423395
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited43

Social media with online social networks has risen to be a prevalent force in information diffusion and public discourse. Despite its popularity and convenience, social media has been criticized for contributing to societal and ideological polarization as the result of trapping users in an echo chamber and filter bubbles. An emerging line of research focuses on ways to redesign content or link recommendation algorithms to mitigate the polarization phenomenon. However, existing works mainly concentrate on node-level balancing, while omitting the balancing effect that can be incurred by edge interaction in social networks. In this article, we take the first step to study the problem (CoAM) that assuming two campaigns are present in a network, how we should select seeds for each so as to maximize the interaction/activity between the followers of two campaigns (co-activity) after the diffusion process is finished. We begin our analysis by showing the hardness of CoAM under two diffusion models that are generalized from wildly used diffusion models and its objective function is neither submodular nor supermodular. This encourages us to design a submodular function that acts as a lower bound to the objective, by exploiting which we are able to devise a greedy algorithm with a provable approximation guarantee. To overcome the #P-hardness of diffusion calculation, we further extend the notion of random reverse-reachable (RR) set to devise a scalable instantiation of our approximation algorithm. We experimentally demonstrate the quality of our approximation algorithm on datasets collected from real-world social networks

Algorithm · Approximation algorithm · Greedy algorithm · Mathematical optimization · Maximization · Popularity · Scalability · Social media · Submodular set function · World Wide Web · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Computer Science · Mathematics · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Social Media and Politics · Theoretical Computer Science

  • Modeling Information Cocoons in Networked Populations

    Open Access•Ming Gu, Tian-Fang Zhao et al.•IEEE Transactions on Computational…•2024

  • The Network Data Repository with Interactive Graph Analytics and Visualization

    Open Access•Ryan A Rossi, Ryan Rossi et al.•Proceedings of the AAAI…•2015

  • Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network

    Open Access•David Kempe, Jon Kleinberg et al.•Proceedings of the ninth ACM…•2003

  • Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election

    Hunt Allcott, Matthew Gentzkow•2017

  • Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks

    Open Access•Wei Chen, Chi Wang et al.•Proceedings of the 16th ACM…•2010

  • The dark side of technology

    Open Access•Ivan B Dylko, Ivan Dylko et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2017

  • Political Polarization on Twitter

    Open Access•Michael Conover, A Ratkiewicz et al.•Proceedings of the International…•2021

  • Fake news and ideological polarization

    Open Access•Dominic Spohr•Business Information Review•2017

  • Mapping social dynamics on Facebook

    Open Access•Michela Del Vicario, Fabiana Zollo et al.•Social Networks•2017

  • Echo chambers online

    Open Access•R Kelly Garrett•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2009

  • Social influence and opinions

    N E Friedkin, Eugene C Johnsen•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1990

  • Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption

    Seymour Flaxman, Seth Flaxman et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2016

  • Does Enclave Deliberation Polarize Opinions

    Open Access•Kimmo Grönlund, Kaisa Herne et al.•Political Behavior•2015

  • A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory

    T F Pettigrew, Linda R Tropp•Journal of Personality and Social…•2006

  • Cross-cutting Social Networks

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•American Political Science Review•2002

  • The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001-2010

    Open Access•Aaron M Mccright, Riley E Dunlap•Sociological Quarterly•2011

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae