Veil of Light
The Role of Light in Cavendish’s Visual Perception
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22109519 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Brooke Willow Sharp (Temple College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 0 |
| Publication date | 2024-02-29 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2330-4014 • E-ISSN: 2330-4014 |
| Publisher | University of Michigan Library (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.3998/ergo.5188 |
| OpenAlex | W4392296795 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
Margaret Cavendish’s views about the nature of bodies and perception leave her with a potentially problematic implication: that light has no role in visual perception. For her, perception occurs through the self-motion of animate matter, not through a mechanical system that appeals to local motions and collisions of contiguous bodies. This means that motion is not transferred from external objects with light playing a mediating role; the matter of our eyes simply moves itself to copy the sensible qualities of external bodies. However, Cavendish cannot ignore the simple empirical fact that we appear to have visual perceptions in the presence of light but not in the presence of darkness. Light must play some role. I argue that light for Cavendish plays an intermediary role but does not transfer motions as the mechanical model suggests. Rather, light behaves like our eyes by moving itself to form copies of external objects. Our eyes then see these copies. For Cavendish, we are directly acquainted with a “veil of light” rather than the objects themselves
Aesthetics · Art · Epistemology · Perception · Historical Philosophy and Science · History of Science and Medicine · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|