Spousal violence in India
Does risk of spousal violence higher among polygynous unions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22110475 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Margubur Rahaman (0000-0003-2403-9033, International Institute for Population Sciences), Avijit Roy (0000-0002-2707-8639, Malda Medical College and Hospital, corresponding author), Nanigopal Kapasia (0000-0001-6386-8155, Malda Medical College and Hospital), Pradip Chouhan (0000-0002-5500-2842, University of Gour Banga) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-31 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cogent Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2331-1886 • E-ISSN: 2331-1886 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23311886.2022.2103945 |
| OpenAlex | W4286945757 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 31 |
This study aims to understand the risk of spousal violence in the context of polygyny in India. National Family Health Survey (2015–16) data has been used in this study. The study population consisted of women who answered the questions regarding spousal violence and the number of additional wives of their husbands. Chi-square significance test and multi-level logistic regression were used to establish the association between spousal violence and polygyny. Findings of the study suggested that women in polygyny marriages experienced higher spousal violence than women in monogamy unions. In particular, the likelihood of overall spousal violence was higher among polygyny marriages (39.9%; 95% CI = 38.5–41.4) than in monogamy marriages (32.6%; 95% CI = 32.3–33). Simultaneously, the likelihood of spousal violence was significantly high in polygyny marriages among Muslims compared to Hindus. Muslim women in polygyny unions (30.4%; 95% CI = 29.4–31.4) faced significantly higher spousal violence than monogamy unions (43.8%; 95% CI = 39.6–48). The study revealed regional variability in relationship between spousal violence and polygyny in India. In the south region, women in polygyny unions’ experienced higher spousal violence compared to other regions. The risk of spousal violence can be reduced by empowering women and launching a community-wide awareness campaign about legal options for spousal violence victims. Efforts in this direction may support India in meeting its long-term development goal of ending violence against women and girls by 2030
Domestic violence · Environmental health · Ethnic group · Geography · Poison control · Polygyny · Population · Sociology · Suicide prevention · Demography · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Marriage and Sexual Relationships · Medicine · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies
Attitudes Towards Justifying Intimate Partner Violence Among Married Women in Bangladesh
A National Study of the Prevalence and Correlates of Domestic Violence Among Women in India
Intimate Partner Violence and Women’s Physical, Mental, and Social Functioning
Is consanguineous marriage related to spousal violence in India? Evidence from the National Family Health Survey, 2015–16
Polygyny and intimate partner violence in sub-Saharan Africa
Polygamy, Purdah and Political Representation
Revisiting the polygyny and intimate partner violence connection
Factors for Divorce of Women Undergoing Divorce in Bangladesh
Trends and correlates of intimate partner violence experienced by ever-married women of India
Controlling behavior, power relations within intimate relationships and intimate partner physical and sexual violence against women in Nigeria
Factors Contributing to Intimate Partner Violence among Men in Kerala, India
State Gender Inequality, Socioeconomic Status and Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in India
Domestic Violence in Sylhet, Bangladesh
To ban or not to ban
Community effects on women’s help-seeking behaviour for intimate partner violence in India
Multidimensional Jealousy
Co-Wife Conflict and Co-operation
Best of Friends and Worst of Enemies
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |