Independent decision-making for sustainable livelihood in pastoral households

A focus on women in Bauchi and Gombe States, Northern Nigeria

Bibliographic Data

ID22110616
AuthorsVerere Sido Balogun (0000-0002-7716-7912, University of Benin, corresponding author), Johnson Egbemudia Dudu (Federal University Kashere), Andrew Godwin Onokerhoraye (Centre for Population and Environmental Development), Job Imharobere Eronmhonsele (0000-0001-8418-1651, China Population and Development Research Center), Rebecca Oghale John-Abebe (University of Benin), Bibi Muhammed (Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, Federal University of Kashere), Bibi Umar Muhammed (Federal University Kashere), Bilkisu Yayaji Ahmed (Gombe State University)
Year2025
Volume11
Issue1
Publication date2025-12-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCogent Social Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2331-1886 • E-ISSN: 2331-1886
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/23311886.2025.2594811
OpenAlexW4416911620
LanguageEN
References cited36

Despite the efforts of female pastoralists to enhance the sustainable livelihoods of their households, they are often constrained by their inability to make critical decisions independently about their livelihoods and family lives. This study aims to determine how demographic characteristics influence the independent decision-making capabilities of pastoralist women and the significance of their independent decision-making in enhancing sustainable livelihoods in pastoralist households in the Bauchi and Gombe States of Northern Nigeria. The study involved interviews with 2290 adult female household members across six Local Government Areas (LGAs) in both states. The results indicate that pastoralist women’s ability to make independent decisions is significantly influenced by their age, marital status, and educational qualifications in most scenarios presented in the study. Most times, decisions on crop/livestock production and sales, family expenditures, family size, and family healthcare are mostly taken by men (who also are the head of households in pastoral communities) or other male household members, even though the funds spent or invested are generated by women who labor tirelessly on the fields to earn income from their own livestock, household livestock and/or by raising the livestock of others. The findings of the study suggest a need for the restructuring of societal power relations, both at the household and community levels, such that women are empowered to make decisions regarding livestock management and family life, reflecting more of their concerns. The study recommends that social capital be made available to pastoralist women, which can ultimately translate into better livelihood outcomes

Focus group · Household income · Livelihood · Livestock · Pastoralism · Restructuring · Social capital · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Transboundary Water Resource Management