Bridging the gender gap
Analyzing women’s participation and leadership representation in university governance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22111147 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mahadih Kyambade (0009-0006-0257-9601, Makerere University, corresponding author), Monica Tushabe (0000-0001-8042-6578, Makerere University), Afulah Namatovu (0009-0001-5799-3950, Makerere University), Sheilla Oyella (Makerere University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cogent Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2331-1886 • E-ISSN: 2331-1886 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23311886.2024.2432519 |
| OpenAlex | W4405108046 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 64 |
The purpose of this article is to investigate the connection between female leadership representation in Uganda’s public universities and gender participation. The study’s design was cross-sectional and quantitative. To provide the data, 280 employees answered a survey using a questionnaire. To analyze the data, a fourth-generation smart partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed. To gather data, questionnaires were employed. The results demonstrated that the representation of women in leadership positions in Uganda’s public universities is influenced by two aspects of gender participation: level of involvement and gender gap. By illuminating whether gender participation factors influence women leadership representation in Uganda’s public universities, this study advances our knowledge of women academic leadership. This suggests that women’s representation in leadership roles is based in large part on gender participation. This study uniquely explores the impact of gender participation on women’s leadership representation in Uganda’s public universities by focusing on two key factors: level of involvement and the gender gap. Using fourth-generation Smart PLS-SEM analysis, it provides fresh insights into how these elements shape women’s leadership roles, especially within the under-studied Ugandan context. This research offers a new perspective on the mechanisms influencing gender representation in leadership
Corporate governance · Economics · Management · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Computer Science · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Work-Family Balance Challenges
Summated Rating Scale Construction
Mirror, mirror on the wall
Social Norms as a Barrier to Women’s Employment in Developing Countries
Gender Stereotypes and Their Impact on Women’s Career Progressions from a Managerial Perspective
Citizen participation in the governance of nature‐based solutions
Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS
Two Structural Equation Models
Gender inequality in academia
An Index of Factorial Simplicity
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Women in limnology
Work life balance and women representation in leadership positions in Ugandan public universities
Affirmative action for women representation on boards of public sector organizations in Uganda
Women leadership in Vietnamese higher education institutions
Academia is racist
Breaking second glass ceiling
Determining Sample Size for Research Activities
Gender mainstreaming since Beijing
Women as leaders
Women and Top Leadership Positions
Negotiating work, family, and traffic
The Politics of Equal Opportunity
The workplace experiences of Bame professional women
Women and the weight of a pandemic
Equal pay behind the “Glass Door”? The gender gap in upper management in a male‐dominated industry
Making visible the invisible”
Differences within Differences
Gender vs. Diversity Mainstreaming
It's about the type of career
Strength in Numbers
Why Does Workplace Gender Diversity Matter? Justice, Organizational Benefits, and Policy
Addressing work-life balance challenges of working women during Covid-19 in Bangladesh
Career mobility from associate to full professor in academia
From Theory to Practice and Back
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |