Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

L’Arche, a Radical Reversal

Fearless Dialogue between Foucault and Vanier with the New Testament

Bibliographic Data

ID22112225
AuthorsKristine C Meneses (0000-0002-4745-3360, University of Santo Tomas, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume24
Issue2
Pages151-173
Publication date2020-04-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Disability & Religion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2331-2521 • E-ISSN: 2331-253X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/23312521.2020.1718571
OpenAlexW3013062261
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited7

Today many of us are unaware and perhaps even deny the fact that our ideas, decisions, and choices are driven by fear whether obvious or subtle. In his seminal book, Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in an Age of Reason, Michel Foucault examines the archeology of madness wherein he illuminates how fear of the other has come to shape society’s moral compass toward persons adjudged as lamentable, engendering certain social constructs that have given shape to what he called the mutation of confinement. In other words, Foucault highlights the historical and cultural turning points that gave rise to the societal belief that necessitates the establishment of confinement. To “cage” people who are different from the composite identity position held by those unmarked by stigmatized identifiers—those who fall outside the “norm”—is perceived as a meaningful exercise toward the greater good and security of society. Juxtaposed with society’s “civilized” attitude toward persons regarded as lamentable and thus worthy of confinement is Jean Vanier’s understanding of the value and dignity of each person—a radical conviction that gave rise to L’Arche, a revolutionary attempt to dismantle the walls of fear within, between, and among us. In what follows, Jean Vanier’s understanding of fear will be comparatively analyzed in relation to the dominant societal notion of fear in order to draw attention to the practical ways in which these ideas have consequences in L’Arche and society as a whole. Underlying this attempt is the contention that Vanier’s notion of fear entails a radical reversal of the “civilized norm” of confinement. This article proceeds in three parts and will offer a theological reflection which could serve as a catalyst for a world that remains enveloped with fear of the other, particularly those deemed different and deviant

Aesthetics · Civilization · Conviction · Dignity · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Political science · Sociology · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · Law · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Psychology · Religion and Society Interactions

  • Militarism and Fear in a Time of Pandemic in the Philippines

    Open Access•Kristine C Meneses•Acta Theologica•2023

  • The lives of Michel Foucault

    David Macey•The lives of Michel Foucault•1993

  • Welcome as Way of Life

    Andrew T Draper•Journal of Disability & Religion•2018

  • The domestication of Foucault

    Open Access•Ansgar Allen, Roy Goddard•History of the Human Sciences•2014

  • Foucault's great confinement

    Open Access•Roy Porter•History of the Human Sciences•1990

  • Did Foucault do Ethics? The "Ethical Turn," Neoliberalism, and the Problem of Truth

    Open Access•Patrick Gamez•Journal of French and Francophone…•2018

  • Madness and Civilization

    Michel Foucault, David Cooper et al.•Madness and Civilization•1961

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae