Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Some Speculations on Biological Evolution from Kant’s and Goethe’s Responses to Egyptian Philosophy

Bibliographic Data

ID22112759
AuthorsRyan L Vilbig (0009-0008-5201-147X), Ryan Vilbig (corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume12
Publication date2025-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Philosophy and Theology (IJPT) (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2333-5750 • E-ISSN: 2333-5769
PublisherThe Brooklyn Research and Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.15640/jpt.v12p1
OpenAlexW4413289728
LanguageEN
References cited12

Both Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832) have been recognized for their scientific ideas that anticipated the later theory of biological evolution (Mayr 1959; Wells 1967). While Kant had referenced the evolutionary rebirth of the phoenix in 1755 and then quoted the inscription of the Egyptian goddess Isis’ Temple as early as 1763, he later questioned in 1796: “though unable to lift the veil of Isis, can [philosophers] yet make it so thin that one may divine the goddess beneath it”? (1796/2002: 439). Along similar lines of thought, Goethe had written of nature’s veil in his artistic and experimental portrayals of biological phenomena in 1808 as follows: “A weaving flowing, Life all- glowing, Thus at Time’s humming loom ’tis my hand prepares, The garment of Life which the Deity wears!” (Goethe 1808/2018: 17). For both, their diverse and subtle references to Egyptian philosophical imagery helped frame their proposals of evolutionary concepts, and these together are demonstrable of characteristics, simultaneously, of a hesitancy to speculate beyond the bounds of their reason, as well as a willingness to allow their thoughts to emerge in new and unexplored contexts

Epistemology · Philosophy of biology · Philosophy of science · Evolution and Science Education · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy

  • Critique of Pure Reason

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Paul Guyer et al.•Critique of Pure Reason•1998

  • Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Ralf Meerbote et al.•Theoretical Philosophy, 1755-1770•1992

  • Lectures on Logic

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, J Michael Young•Lectures on Logic•1992

  • Mechanical Explanation in the “Critique of the Teleological Power of Judgment”

    Peter Mclaughlin•Kant's theory of biology•2014

  • Faust, the Plague, and Theodicy

    Alfred Hoelzel•The German Quarterly•1979

  • Philosophy Against Empire

    Open Access•Charles C Verharen•Journal of Black Studies•2006

  • A role for history and philosophy in science teaching

    Michael R Matthews•Educational Philosophy and Theory•1988

  • Goethe and the Intermaxillary Bone

    Open Access•George A Wells•The British Journal for the…•1967

  • Goethe and Evolution

    George A Wells•Journal of the History of Ideas•1967

  • The Sinophilism of Christian Wolff (1679-1754)

    Donald F Lach•Journal of the History of Ideas•1953

  • Remapping Biology with Goethe, Schelling, and Herder

    Gregory Rupik•Remapping Biology with Goethe,…•2024

  • Romantic Philosophy and Natural Sciences

    Elias Palti•Contributions to the History of…•2005

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae