Happy Hens or Healthy Eggs – A Summative Content Analysis Of How Hens Are Represented In Supermarket Egg Boxes Narratives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22115806 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kristine Hill (0000-0002-3429-5818, University of Exeter, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Pages | 70-94 |
| Publication date | 2021-04-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | TRACE ∴ Journal for Human-Animal Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2343-0591 • E-ISSN: 2343-0591 |
| Publisher | Trace - Finnish Journal for Human-Animal Studies (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.23984/fjhas.98684 |
| OpenAlex | W3150604819 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 16 |
How a species is represented by marketers of animal-based products both reflects and shapes how consumers think about that animal. By examining the explicit statements, and implicit messages encoded in the imagery on supermarket egg boxes, this paper explores how hens are represented by whole egg retailers. Samples were collected from supermarket chain websites in the US, the UK, and Germany during March 2017. A summative content analysis reveals two prominent narratives purveyed through eggbox imagery (textual and visual), namely those pertaining to hen welfare and human health. The latter disenfranchises hens from their products by focusing on the nutritional value of eggs, whereas the former reflects a public concern for the welfare of egg-laying hens. Although claims of improvements in welfare practices are undoubtedly exploited as marketing tools, they nevertheless serve to raise awareness and drive competitors to adopt similar practices. Welfare claims are a direct response to public concerns about the plight of hens, and may positively influence industry welfare standards. However, idyllic depictions displayed on eggboxes also lull consumers into the belief that those eggs are an ethically sound food choice, regardless of the actual standard of living experienced by the hens
Advertising · Animal welfare · Art · Biology · Business · Competitor analysis · Economics · Market economy · Narrative · Statistics · Summative assessment · Welfare · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies · Mathematics · Psychology · Ecology · Marketing
Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare
Consumers’ perceptions of organic food attributes and cognitive and affective attitudes as determinants of their purchase intentions toward organic food
From “Animal Machines” to “Happy Meat”? Foucault’s Ideas of Disciplinary and Pastoral Power Applied to ‘Animal-Centred’ Welfare Discourse
Anthropomorphism and Anthropomorphic Selection—Beyond the "Cute Response"
The Effect of Packaging Color and Health Claims on Product Attitude and Buying Intention
Process attributes of goods, ethical considerations and implications for animal products
Anthropocentrism
The Caged Chicken or the Free-Range Egg? The Regulatory and Market Dynamics of Layer-Hen Welfare in the UK, Australia and the USA
Consumption of organic and functional food. A matter of well-being and health
Meat eaters by dissociation
The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Attitudes Toward Animal Use
Children's Welfare Knowledge of and Empathy with Farm Animals
Belief in Pigs' Capacity to Suffer
Animal Ethics Profiling of Vegetarians, Vegans and Meat-Eaters
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |