From Denial to Punishment
Strategic Shift in India’s Deterrence Strategy Towards China Post-Galwan
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22116357 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Soumyodeep Deb (0000-0001-7218-1945, Department of Government and International Affairs, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, China, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 315-339 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2347-7970 • E-ISSN: 2349-0039 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/23477970251351402 |
| OpenAlex | W4412810438 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 18 |
The dynamics of the India–China relationship have undergone a significant transformation in recent years, with mistrust and suspicion clouding the bilateral ties. This article argues that India’s strategic deterrence posture towards China has shifted from denial to punishment following the 2020 Galwan crisis, which resulted in casualties on both sides. The study aims to examine the measures taken by India post-2020 that demonstrate this shift in strategy and the implications for the overall India–China relations. This article contends that India has applied punitive measures in the military, economic and diplomatic domains to deter China’s actions along the border, with the goal of raising the overall cost for China. The theoretical framework of deterrence is employed to analyse the shift from denial to punishment, highlighting the importance of military capability, credibility and communication in enhancing a state’s deterrence posture. This article also discusses the evolution of deterrence theory in the post-Cold War era, with the emergence of technologically advanced conventional weapons altering the nature of modern conflict. The study concludes that the shift towards deterrence by punishment is likely to intensify competition between India and China, making it the new norm in their bilateral relations. The findings contribute to the understanding of India’s evolving conventional deterrence posture towards China and its multidomain approach to deterrence
Business · China · Criminology · Denial · Deterrence theory · Development economics · Economics · Political science · Global Security and Public Health · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East · Psychology · Social Psychology
Deterrence Now
Conventional Deterrence
Deterrence and Defense
From Denial to Punishment
Deterrence through Inflicting Costs
Explaining the asymmetry in the Sino-Indian Strategic Rivalry
Thucydides and Deterrence
Deterrence and Dissuasion in Cyberspace
The weaponisation of everything
Indian security policy
Desert Storm and Deterrence
| Highly cited | No |
|---|