Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From Denial to Punishment

Strategic Shift in India’s Deterrence Strategy Towards China Post-Galwan

Bibliographic Data

ID22116357
AuthorsSoumyodeep Deb (0000-0001-7218-1945, Department of Government and International Affairs, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, China, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume12
Issue3
Pages315-339
Publication date2025-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Asian Security and International Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2347-7970 • E-ISSN: 2349-0039
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/23477970251351402
OpenAlexW4412810438
LanguageEN
References cited18

The dynamics of the India–China relationship have undergone a significant transformation in recent years, with mistrust and suspicion clouding the bilateral ties. This article argues that India’s strategic deterrence posture towards China has shifted from denial to punishment following the 2020 Galwan crisis, which resulted in casualties on both sides. The study aims to examine the measures taken by India post-2020 that demonstrate this shift in strategy and the implications for the overall India–China relations. This article contends that India has applied punitive measures in the military, economic and diplomatic domains to deter China’s actions along the border, with the goal of raising the overall cost for China. The theoretical framework of deterrence is employed to analyse the shift from denial to punishment, highlighting the importance of military capability, credibility and communication in enhancing a state’s deterrence posture. This article also discusses the evolution of deterrence theory in the post-Cold War era, with the emergence of technologically advanced conventional weapons altering the nature of modern conflict. The study concludes that the shift towards deterrence by punishment is likely to intensify competition between India and China, making it the new norm in their bilateral relations. The findings contribute to the understanding of India’s evolving conventional deterrence posture towards China and its multidomain approach to deterrence

Business · China · Criminology · Denial · Deterrence theory · Development economics · Economics · Political science · Global Security and Public Health · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Deterrence Now

    Open Access•Patrick M Morgan•Deterrence Now•2003

  • Conventional Deterrence

    John J Mearsheimer•Conventional Deterrence (Cornell…•1985

  • Deterrence and Defense

    Glenn Herald Snyder•Deterrence and Defense•1961

  • From Denial to Punishment

    Yogesh Joshi, Anit Mukherjee•Asian Security•2018

  • Deterrence through Inflicting Costs

    Open Access•Amir Lupovici•International Studies Review•2023

  • Explaining the asymmetry in the Sino-Indian Strategic Rivalry

    Manjeet S Pardesi•Australian Journal Of International…•2021

  • Thucydides and Deterrence

    Richard Ned Lebow•Security Studies•2007

  • Deterrence and Dissuasion in Cyberspace

    Joseph S Nye•International Security•2017

  • The weaponisation of everything

    Open Access•Elizabeth Buchanan•International Affairs•2022

  • Indian security policy

    Peter J S Duncan•International Affairs•1987

  • Desert Storm and Deterrence

    William J Perry•Foreign Affairs•1991

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae