Uncounted Success

Traditional dispute resolution mechanisms (TDRMs) have long served as foundational tools for managing conflict across African societies. Grounded in communal norms and restorative justice principles, these systems provide accessible, culturally legitimate, and often highly effective alternatives to formal litigation. Yet, despite their enduring relevance and demonstrable success, TDRMs remain insufficiently recognized within formal legal frameworks, marginally represented in policy debates, and largely overlooked in contemporary justice sector reforms. This paper interrogates the paradox of “uncounted success” — traditional justice mechanisms that consistently deliver meaningful outcomes yet remain excluded from official metrics, legal education, and institutional support. Drawing on comparative insights from Rwanda, Uganda, and South Africa, this paper traces the historical marginalization of customary systems, the persistence of legal hierarchies, and the structural challenges inherent in integrating plural justice models. It further engages with rights‐based critiques and procedural concerns, while outlining reform pathways that safeguard cultural legitimacy and strengthen legal accountability. By rethinking the place of traditional dispute resolution in Africa’s justice landscape, the paper advances a more inclusive and pluralistic conception of justice—one that recognizes and values effective practices, even when they operate beyond the boundaries of the courtroom

Alternative dispute resolution · Dispute mechanism · Dispute resolution · Economic Justice · Legitimacy · Online dispute resolution · Plural · Transitional justice · Conflict Management and Negotiation · Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law · Political Conflict and Governance