Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Qualitative Analysis of Sociological Factors Affecting Sugarcane Productivity in Central Valley of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Bibliographic Data

ID22129231
AuthorsMuhammad Nisar (0000-0001-8873-1227, Bacha Khan University), Asad Ullah (0000-0002-8629-6281, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar), Fazal Hanan (FATA University), Younas Khan (0000-0001-7616-4341, Bacha Khan University), Habib Ur Rahman (0000-0003-4791-4689, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar)
Year2021
Volume9
Issue3
Pages962-972
Publication date2021-06-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanities & Social Sciences Reviews (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2395-6518 • E-ISSN: 2395-6518
PublisherMaya Global Education Society (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.18510/hssr.2021.9394
OpenAlexW3173146474
LanguageEN
References cited19

Purpose of the study: This research study was designed to analyze various social factors like population dynamics, institutional, land tenure, and gender other than the technological one that affects the production of sugarcane in farming communities. Methodology: The method of the study was qualitative, where the data was collected through FGDs. Two FGDs were conducted in two districts of the central valley of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa-Pakistan. Each FGD consisted of 10 participants. The data was analyzed through thematic analysis. Main Findings: The findings of the study revealed that sugarcane productivity is affected by sociological factors like technological ones. The poor socioeconomic status of the farmers, wasting resources in land disputes, frequent land division among heirs, a rapid increase of population growth, unplanned urbanization conversion of fertile agricultural land into the built environment, weakening the role of informal institutions like Jirga and farmers organizations, lack of access to agricultural institutions, the restricted role of women in farming and unfavourable attitude of farmers towards new agrarian technologies, all were the significant contributing factors that negatively influenced sugarcane productivity. Applications of this study: The findings of the study be used by the agricultural department, NGOs, and the government while taking into consideration the factors responsible for sugarcane productivity. Novelty/Originality of this study: This study is novel that no study has yet conducted while considering sociological factors in sugarcane production in Pakistan. This research a unique in that provides a base for agricultural scientists to keep in mind social factors as well in agrarian production besides technological factors

Agrarian society · Agricultural economics · Agricultural productivity · Agriculture · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Population · Productivity · Qualitative research · Social science · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Urbanization · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing

  • The effects of China's cultivated land balance program on potential land productivity at a national scale

    Open Access•Wei Song, Bryan C Pijanowski•Applied Geography•2014

  • Member Checking With Older Women

    Susanna Doyle•Health Care For Women International•2007

  • Evaluating Interpretive Inquiry

    Open Access•Maureen Jane Angen, Maureen Angen•Qualitative Health Research•2000

  • Evaluating Interpretive Inquiry

    M J Angen•Journal of Contemporary Ethnography•2000

  • Rural urbanization, land, and agriculture in Pakistan

    M A Z Mughal•Asian Geographer•2018

  • Impact of urbanization on cultivated land changes in China

    Open Access•Xiangzheng Deng, Jikun Huang et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists

    Open Access•Anselm L Strau, Anselm L Strauss•Qualitative Analysis for Social…•1987

  • An array of qualitative data analysis tools

    Nancy L Leech, Anthony J Onwuegbuzie•School Psychology Quarterly•2007

  • Member Checking

    Open Access•Linda Birt, Suzanne Scott et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2016

  • Why Things (Sometimes) Go Wrong in Focus Groups

    Open Access•David L Morgan•Qualitative Health Research•1995

  • Capturing the Group Effect in Focus Groups

    Open Access•Martha Ann Carey, Mickey W Smith•Qualitative Health Research•1994

  • Differences in resource management affects drought vulnerability across the borders between Iraq, Syria, and Turkey

    Open Access•Lina Eklund, Darcy Thompson et al.•Conservation Ecology•2017

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae