Sources of variability in the syntactic flexibility of idioms
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22130412 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marta Wierzba (0000-0001-8610-0464, University of Potsdam), J M M Brown (0000-0002-0693-9735, University of Potsdam), Gisbert Fanselow (0000-0002-1877-865X, University of Potsdam) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2023-06-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Glossa a journal of general linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2397-1835 • E-ISSN: 2397-1835 |
| Publisher | Open Library of the Humanities (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.16995/glossa.8502 |
| OpenAlex | W4377089945 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 22 |
Idiomatic verb phrases (e.g., kick the bucket, fig. 'to die') vary in their syntactic flexibility: they can undergo operations like, e.g., passivization (“The bucket was kicked”) to varying degrees. We (re-)consider potential sources of this variability. It has been proposed that compositionality influences syntactic flexibility of idioms. In the first part of the paper, we reassess this finding from a methodological perspective by replicating earlier experiments on German and English, in which we change the previously used – and potentially biased – methods of measuring compositionality. Our results for German are compatible with the view that higher compositionality makes some of the tested structures more acceptable (most consistently: scrambling, prefield fronting, and which-questions), while we do not find a connection between compositionality and flexibility for English. In the second part of the paper, we present an additional experiment following up on the German findings. We extend the empirical domain and explore factors which – in contrast to compositionality – have the potential of explaining the syntactic flexibility of both idioms and non-idioms. We find that definiteness influences the flexibility of idioms and non-idioms in similar ways, supporting the view that both types of expressions are subject to the same grammatical rules. We discuss referentiality as a potential underlying semantic source for the behavior of both idioms and non-idioms
Definiteness · German · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Principle of compositionality · Programming language · Semantic property · Verb · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · linguistics and terminology studies · Mathematics · Philosophy · Artificial Intelligence
Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms
Referential and quantificational indefinites
Constructions
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
LmerTest Package
Hebrew Idioms
Specificity and Definiteness in Sentence and Discourse Structure
Analysis of rating scales
English idioms in the first language and second language lexicon
Idioms
The syntactic flexibility of German and English idioms
Analyzing ordinal data with metric models
How flexible are idioms? A corpus-based study
Idioms and the syntax/semantics interface of descriptive content vs. reference
Idioms
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |