The distribution of SE-reflexives in Dutch
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22130752 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hans Broekhuis (Meertens Institute, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2022-02-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Glossa a journal of general linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2397-1835 • E-ISSN: 2397-1835 |
| Publisher | Open Library of the Humanities (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.16995/glossa.5821 |
| OpenAlex | W4206987607 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 21 |
Handling clause-bound SE-reflexives such as Dutch zich transcends the scope of Chomsky’s (1981) binding theory and has motivated various revisions of it. This article argues that canonical binding theory is essentially correct because SE-reflexives are not bound but inalienably possessed by their antecedent. Rooryck & Vanden Wyngaerd (2011) provides a syntactic implementation of this idea, which has mainly been elaborated for SE-reflexives in reflexive-verb constructions. This article shows that it can also account for the distribution of Dutch SE-reflexives in a wider range of constructions by considering it in conjunction with the analysis of inalienable possession in Broekhuis & Cornips (1997)
Linguistics · Sociology · Verb · Computer Science · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
The Raising of Predicates
Prolific Domains
Relators and Linkers
The Syntax of Icelandic
Domains and Dynasties
Particles
Lectures on Government and Binding
Case dependencies
Unergatives as Copular Verbs; Locational and Existential Predication
Inalienable possession in locational constructions
Knowledge of language
Inalienables in Norwegian and binding theory
Long-distance anaphora
Inalienable possession in locational constructions☆
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |