Documenting Birthright Citizenship under Chinese Exclusion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22130995 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anna Pegler-Gordon (0009-0002-7209-4280, Michigan State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 382-389 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Modern American History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2397-1851 • E-ISSN: 2515-0456 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/mah.2025.10037 |
| OpenAlex | W7128381220 |
| Language | EN |
Following the Wong Kim Ark decision in 1898, ethnic Chinese, other Asians, and almost all individuals born on U.S. soil secured the right to jus soli birthright citizenship. They could not, however, secure recognition of their citizenship without documentation, the key that linked birth to birthright. At a time when birth registration was not common, ethnic Chinese were able to establish U.S. citizenship in two main ways: through an order by a U.S. District Court or certification by U.S. immigration authorities. 1 However, this documentation did not settle questions of the holder’s identity, immigration or citizenship status. Immigration inspectors generally doubted testimony given in these cases and believed that it was used to obtain fraudulent documentation of lawful immigration or citizenship status
Certification · Citizenship · Documentation · Ethnic group · Immigration · American History and Culture · Asian American and Pacific Histories · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
| Highly cited | No |
|---|