Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Towards a Theory of Dynamicity

Foundations for a Non-Vacuous Process Metaphysics

Bibliographic Data

ID22134282
AuthorsMaximilian Zachrau (0009-0001-9342-4181, University of Siegen, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume11
Issue2
Pages32
Publication date2026-03-06
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2409-9287 • E-ISSN: 2409-9287
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/philosophies11020032
OpenAlexW7134059840
LanguageEN
References cited38

Process metaphysics seeks to provide a novel foundation for metaphysical explanations of entities in both scientific inquiry and everyday experience. It aims to better explain ongoing phenomena—moving, raining, and the like—by analysing them as fundamental processes (FP), that is, dynamic entities not further reducible. Crucially, I argue, this analysis and the ultimate value of process metaphysical explanation hinge on an understanding of what dynamicity is; without one, the central thesis concerning fundamental processes remains vacuous. The paper examines metametaphysically what an account of dynamicity should provide, defending three desiderata: (1) difference-making: it must draw an informative, not merely stipulative, distinction between dynamic and static entities; (2) explanatory power: it must provide the conceptual resources to yield explanatory claims about dynamic entities and apply broadly. On the basis of these desiderata, I argue that prominent accounts of dynamicity, that is the mereological and modal account, prove unsatisfactory or miss their mark. The paper concludes by developing and defending an account of dynamicity as temporal forward-directedness, thereby linking process metaphysics to realist theories of time

Mereology · Metaphysics · Modal · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

  • Potentiality

    Barbara Vetter•Potentiality•2015

  • Everything Flows

    Open Access•Daniel J Nicholson, John Dupré•Everything Flows•2018

  • The Powers Metaphysic

    Neil E Williams, Neil Williams•Powers Metaphysic•2019

  • What Not to Multiply Without Necessity

    Jonathan Schaffer•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2015

  • Some Consequences (and Enablings) of Process Metaphysics

    Open Access•Mark H Bickhard•Axiomathes•2011

  • Writing the Book of the World

    Theodore Sider•Writing the book of the world•2011

  • Powers, Processes, and Time

    Open Access•Giovanni Giannini•Erkenntnis•2022

  • Dynamic all the way down

    Open Access•Donatella Donati, Simone Gozzano•Ratio•2024

  • Dynamics Is Not Enough

    Open Access•Mark H Bickhard•Human Development•2019

  • I.—the Unreality of Time

    J Ellis McTaggart•Mind•1908

  • Conceptualizing causal powers

    Open Access•Ruth Porter Groff•Synthese•2021

  • Ideological parsimony

    Open Access•Sam Cowling•Synthese•2013

  • Forms of emergent interaction in General Process Theory

    Open Access•Johanna Seibt•Synthese•2009

  • Verbs and Times

    Zeno Vendler•The Philosophical Review•1957

  • Process, Action, and Experience

    Rowland Stout•Process, Action, and Experience•2018

  • Philosophical Papers Volume II

    David Lewis, David K Lewis et al.•Philosophical papers•1987

  • Power and activity

    Open Access•Neil E Williams, Neil Williams•Philosophical Studies•2025

  • Events, processes, and states

    Open Access•Alexander P D Mourelatos•Linguistics and Philosophy•1978

  • When Is Parsimony a Virtue

    Michael Huemer•The Philosophical Quarterly•2009

  • C-theories of time

    Open Access•Matt Farr•Philosophy Compass•2020

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae