Inconsistent, Vague, and…Just? An Analysis of the National Football League’s 2021 Covid-19 Policy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22134341 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Steven Gimbel (0000-0003-3330-1208, Gettysburg College, corresponding author), Joseph R Radzevick (Gettysburg College), Joseph Radzevick (Gettysburg College) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 27 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-08 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2409-9287 • E-ISSN: 2409-9287 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/philosophies7020027 |
| OpenAlex | W4220795672 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
The National Football League, the premier professional organization for American football, developed a policy concerning the protocol in cases where players contract COVID-19. This policy includes elements such as collective punishment that appear, at first glance, to be morally problematic. To the contrary, the policy is indeed morally acceptable as we should not think of organizations such as the NFL in the same way we think of governments in stable nations, but rather in the same way that we think of hybrid justice systems in countries where because of histories of colonialism, the identity of citizens is divided, with tribal identities being more important than national citizenship
Citizenship · Economic Justice · Football · League · National identity · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Doping in Sports · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Public Administration · Social Psychology · Sports Analytics and Performance · Sports, Gender, and Society
| Highly cited | No |
|---|