Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Alexander Turgenev’s diary and Chaadaev’s first Philosophical Letter

A chronicle of Moscow life (unpublished episodes)

Bibliographic Data

ID22136015
AuthorsVéra Milchina (0000-0003-3896-0085), Alexander Ospovat
Year2022
Volume8
Issue2
Pages145-176
Publication date2022-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueShagi / Steps (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2412-9410 • E-ISSN: 2782-1765
PublisherThe Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.22394/2412-9410-2022-8-2-145-176
OpenAlexW4285144524
LanguageEN

The diaries and correspondence of Alexander Turgenev, to this day published only fragmentarily, contain important information on the early, pre-publication history of Petr Chaadaev’s First Philosophical Letter and the first stages of the heated debate provoked by its appearance in print in 1836. The first part of the article illuminates Chaadaev’s attempts to publicize his Letter in France in the mid-1830s. Because of his deep, well-established ties to Paris journalism Turgenev was selected by Chaadaev as his intermediary but showed surprising hesitation. Turgenev, a self-proclaimed Protestant “in his mind,” did not share Chaadaev’s Catholic zeal, and the Letter’s rhetorical fervor could not fully compensate for its derivative dependence on well-worn tropes of European political thought of the time. The article draws on Turgenev’s unpublished letters to Chaadaev to trace Turgenev’s maneuverings that allowed him to avoid the questionable honor of facilitating a French publication by the “Russian de Maistre” or “Russian Lamennais”. The second part of the article is based on Turgenev’s unpublished diary written in Moscow in October-November 1836. Confronted with public outrage after the publication of Chaadaev’s First Letter in Teleskop, Turgenev developed a double strategy. In conversations with Chaadaev and his inner circle, Turgenev harshly criticized Chaadaev’s self-centered ambition that led to the prosecution of the editor of the journal and its censor. At the same time, as a regular participant of the Moscow salons where rage against Chaadaev’s letter was in vogue, Turgenev was possibly the only one to “argue in favor of the freedom to speak freely about Russia”

Psychoanalysis · Classics · Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication · History · Philosophy · Psychology · Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies · Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae