Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reading Spatial Governmentality, Understanding Mentality of Violence in Lampuki, Puya ke Puya, and Dawuk

Bibliographic Data

ID22140482
AuthorsHarfiyah Widiawati (0000-0002-3174-928X, National Research and Innovation Agency), Melani Budianta (University of Indonesia), Manneke Budiman (0000-0002-8903-0972, University of Indonesia)
Year2022
Volume22
Issue1
Pages49-63
Publication date2022-06-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMOZAIK HUMANIORA (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2442-935X • E-ISSN: 2442-935X
PublisherUniversitas Airlangga (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.20473/mozaik.v22i1.34019
OpenAlexW4312644065
LanguageEN
References cited15

Post-Reform Indonesian novels such as Lampuki by Arafat Nur, Dari Puya ke Puya by Faisal Oddang, and Dawuk by Mahfud Ikhwan critically question the problem of governmentality, inviting us to ponder upon how works of literature formulate a social change in terms of state crisis, economic uncertainty, and other instabilities. The theme of spatial governmentality in the form of conflicts due to land appropriation/acquisition and land use, shows the dynamic of power, spread to various state and non-state actors with diverse interests. This paper analyzes how spatial governmentality embodies itself in the narrative structure of the three novels in order to eventually scrutinize how power implicates structural violence. The discourse on governmentality frequently uses benign jargon such as progress, development, modernity; while in fact it is a process full of structural violence, often involving the deprivation of marginalized people’s land and livelihood. The change in spatial form, followed by economic and social transformation, enables those in power to dominate the circle of production and deprive the right to live through the limitation/closing of access to modality, i.e. the land as source of livelihood

Appropriation · Epistemology · Geography · Governmentality · Linguistics · Livelihood · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Islamic Finance and Communication · Law · Philosophy

  • Reading for Genre

    P Holden•Interventions•2010

  • Politics and Literature in Independent Indonesia

    Keith Foulcher•Asian journal of social science•1987

  • From “Spaces of Fear” to “Fearscapes”

    Open Access•Simone Tulumello•Space and Culture•2015

  • Objects of Manipulation

    Open Access•N Herriman•South East Asia Research•2010

  • What does it mean to be modern? Indonesia's reformasi

    Patrick Smith, Patrick J Smith•The Washington Quarterly•1999

  • Resolving Land-Use Conflicts over Indonesia’s Customary Forests

    Laely Nurhidayah, Peter J Davies et al.•Contemporary Southeast Asia•2020

  • Literature and Governmentality

    Open Access•Josef Marx, John Marx•Literature Compass•2011

  • Genealogies of the Political Forest and Customary Rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand

    Open Access•Nancy Lee Peluso, P Vandergeest•The Journal of Asian Studies•2001

  • Technologies of Servitude

    Daromir Rudnyckyj•Anthropological Quarterly•2004

  • A Political Mythology of World Order

    Open Access•M Dean•Theory Culture & Society•2006

  • Indigenous land claims or green grabs? Inclusions and exclusions within forest carbon politics in Indonesia

    Rini Astuti, Andrew Mcgregor•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2017

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae