Technological Transfer and China's "Local Response"
The Establishment of the First Machine Wallpaper Production in Shanghai and Tianjin
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22149159 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Meng Li (0000-0003-4257-1832, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 126-138 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Культура и искусство (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2454-0625 • E-ISSN: 2454-0625 |
| Publisher | Aurora Group, s.r.o (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.7256/2454-0625.2026.2.77882 |
| OpenAlex | W7133337108 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
This study investigates the process of technological transfer in machine-based wallpaper production in China during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, with a specific focus on the concomitant local design responses it engendered. Employing a comparative analysis of Shanghai and Tianjin—two pivotal port cities that served as gateways for Western technologies—the research elucidates the distinct mechanisms through which Western lithography was adopted, adapted, and ultimately hybridized with indigenous aesthetic traditions. The methodological approach is interdisciplinary, synthesizing archival documents, material analysis of historical product samples, and contemporary periodicals to construct a nuanced historical narrative. The analysis reveals two divergent models of local adaptation. In the commercial metropolis of Shanghai, adaptation followed a logic of market-driven hybridization. Factories initially reproduced European patterns but rapidly evolved to create designs that strategically incorporated traditional Chinese symbols—such as peonies, butterflies, and motifs denoting longevity—executed with the new lithographic techniques. This created a visually modern product tailored to local consumer taste. In contrast, industrial enterprises in Tianjin, often linked to state-led "Self-Strengthening" initiatives, pursued a more culturally assertive path. Their designs demonstrated a deeper engagement with the compositional schemes and subject matter of traditional guohua painting and popular nianhua prints, resulting in a style perceived as more authentically "northern" and reserved. Beyond regional comparisons, the work delves into the complex coexistence of old and new technologies. It details how advanced lithography, capable of fine gradients and vibrant imported aniline dyes, did not simply replace traditional woodblock printing. Instead, a market segmentation emerged, and a technical hybridization occurred where lithography might be used for backgrounds while key symbolic elements were added via wooden blocks. This phenomenon underscores the cultural dimensions of technological choice. Theoretically, the research is framed by the theory of technological transfer and visual studies, emphasizing that transfer is a complex sociocultural process of selection, modification, and re-invention, not passive copying. Its scholarly novelty lies in elevating the overlooked wallpaper industry to a significant case study for examining early industrialization, consumer culture, and cultural dynamics in modern China. The findings contribute to modernization debates by demonstrating that global technological flows precipitated creative local negotiations and syntheses. In conclusion, the article posits that wallpaper design served as an active agent and a tangible field for China's "local response." The evolution from imitation to creative synthesis reflects a profound process of cultural reflection and adaptation, which played a crucial role in shaping the unique aesthetic contours of early Chinese modernism during this pivotal transitional era
Handicraft · Indigenous · Lithography · Soft power · Chinese history and philosophy · Crafts, Textile, and Design · Fashion and Cultural Textiles
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |