A Nation Still in Search of a New History
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22156526 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emma Gattey (0000-0002-3406-1851, University of Cambridge, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-05 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Counterfutures (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2463-5340 • E-ISSN: 2463-5359 |
| Publisher | University of Otago Library (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.11157/cf.v15.254 |
| OpenAlex | W4407682768 |
| Language | EN |
Bain Attwood ‘A Bloody Difficult Subject’: Ruth Ross, te Tiriti o Waitangi and the Making of History. Auckland: Auckland University Press, 2023, 320pp. Pākehā historian Ruth Ross is the hook for ‘A Bloody Difficult Subject’: Ruth Ross, te Tiriti o Waitangi and the Making of History. But this book is a genealogy of national proportions, charting the reception and reinterpretations of Treaty history by the Pākehā academy. In this regard, I would recommend it to all students of New Zealand historiography. But the book cannot stand alone. It scarcely gestures to other formative practitioners of history. This is simply not a justifiable choice. Specifically, Bain Attwood tries to annihilate an origin story of the nation, critiquing what he calls ‘foundational’ histories of te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi. In its place, he provides an excellent narration of the mainstream strand of Treaty historiography: that written from a perspective that prioritises Pākehā experiences and ideas. In so doing, Attwood implies that this is the only strand that matters. He is wrong
| Highly cited | No |
|---|