Haptic Compensation in Blind People’s Conceptual Representations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22157705 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Laura J Speed (0000-0002-3147-3615, Radboud University Nijmegen), Eva D Poort (0000-0002-3108-9146, Radboud University Nijmegen), Tanita P Duiker (Radboud University Nijmegen), Heidi Baseler (University of York), Heidi A Baseler (0000-0003-0995-8453, University of York), A Majid (0000-0003-0132-216X, University of Oxford) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Pages | 1786-1801 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-17 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Open MIND (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2470-2986 • E-ISSN: 2470-2986 |
| Publisher | MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1162/opmi.a.250 |
| PMID | 41246214 |
| OpenAlex | W4416439137 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 50 |
Vision is typically dominant in our perception of the world. Such asymmetry is also observed in conceptual representations. This could be driven by perceptual experience or learned from other input, such as language. In this study we tested the role of direct perceptual experience in conceptual representation by investigating the sensory underpinnings of word meanings in blind and sighted individuals. Seventeen early-blind and 17 matched sighted Dutch native speakers rated 100 Dutch nouns for their sensory associations across six modalities (vision, audition, haptic, interoception, gustation, and olfaction) on a 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much) scale. To cover a range of concepts we used five semantic categories thought to be strongly associated with different sensory modalities: animals (vision), instruments (audition), tactile objects (haptics), food (gustation), and odor objects (olfaction). We found no difference between blind and sighted individuals in their ratings of visual associations, suggesting that conceptual associations with vision can be learned indirectly via means beyond direct visual perception. However, blind participants did associate concepts more strongly with haptics than sighted participants for all semantic categories except animals. This is evidence for crossmodal compensation in conceptual representation, in line with enhanced tactile acuity reported elsewhere for blind individuals. Overall, the results point to a role for perceptual experience in conceptual representation, but suggest there are other strategies that can be recruited to learn about perception, supporting hybrid models of semantic representation
Conceptual framework · Crossmodal · Haptic perception · Haptic technology · Modalities · Perception · Stimulus modality · Visual perception · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Multisensory perception and integration · Tactile and Sensory Interactions
The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms
Gorilla in our midst
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
LmerTest Package
Exploring conceptual representation and grounding through perceptual strength norms in deaf individuals
Images of the unseen
Free word association is driven by local response chaining of linguistic and sensorimotor relationships
Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies
Assessing vividness of mental imagery
| Highly cited | No |
|---|