Community Care in Action
Scaling Doula Support Through a Health Department–Community Partnership
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22158755 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Monique Baumont (0000-0001-9166-0466, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, corresponding author), Sara Gelb (New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene), Isabel DoCampo (New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene), Gabriela Ammann (New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene), Monique Jaques (Flow Analysis (United States)), Nataly Jasso Morales (Richmond University Medical Center), Mary‐Powel Thomas (New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene), Mary-Powel Thomas (New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Pages | 24731242261462522-24731242261462522 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Equity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2473-1242 • E-ISSN: 2473-1242 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/24731242261462522 |
| PMID | 42534754 |
| OpenAlex | W7166845665 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 27 |
Introduction: Doula support is increasingly recognized as a promising strategy to address racial inequities in maternal health. The New York City Health Department launched the Citywide Doula Initiative (CDI) in March 2022 to expand access to free, community-based doula support in disinvested neighborhoods. Methods: To evaluate the program’s first year of implementation, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 44 clients, doulas, doula-organization staff, and Health Department staff between November 2022 and April 2023. We coded interview notes using template analysis (a thematic analysis approach) and grouped barriers and facilitators according to the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model. Results: Facilitators included high perceived value of the CDI, a shared commitment to community, open communication, and policymaker support for doula work. Barriers included insufficient time for planning, cumbersome bureaucratic processes, and cultural and capacity differences between the Health Department and community partners. Additional factors, such as—variation in hospital treatment of doulas, doula-organization capacity, doula skills and experiences, and client needs and circumstances—had mixed effects on program implementation. Discussion: Findings indicate that community-based doula models, which have been shown to improve birth outcomes in disinvested communities, can be successfully scaled in an urban setting. Programs seeking to expand access to doula support should prioritize time for planning, allocate sufficient resources for administrative support, and work to establish efficient and responsive payment and contracting processes. Having mission-driven staff at all levels of the program and prioritizing relationships with community-based organizations and doulas are vital for success
Bureaucracy · Community health · Emergency department · General partnership · Health care · Payment · Thematic analysis · Work (physics) · Global Maternal and Child Health · Maternal and fetal healthcare · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Continuous support for women during childbirth
Narrative review of models and success factors for scaling up public health interventions
Doula Services Within a Healthy Start Program
Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of a Community Doula Program for Black and Pacific Islander Pregnant People in San Francisco
Facilitators and Barriers to Medicaid Doula Benefit Implementation in California
Time, Dual Roles, and Departments of Public Health
Involving Local Health Departments in Community Health Partnerships
Role of Doulas in Improving Maternal Health and Health Equity Among Medicaid Enrollees, 2014‒2023
Doula Care, Birth Outcomes, and Costs Among Medicaid Beneficiaries
Six Components Necessary for Effective Public Health Program Implementation
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |