Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Perceptions of male vs. female English L2 speaker comprehensibility

Bibliographic Data

ID22164331
AuthorsPhilip Head (0000-0003-4780-1131, Osaka Jogakuin University, corresponding author), Noriko Yamane (0000-0003-2257-7911, Hiroshima University)
Year2025
Volume10
Publication date2025-12-16
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/feduc.2025.1726243
OpenAlexW4417354553
LanguageEN
References cited33

Evaluation of English as an additional language (L2) speech comprehensibility in classroom and standardized test situations is important for students’ academic and career success. While previous research has found phonetic differences between male and female speech, as well as disparities in language learning ability and academic achievement, little is known about how these gender-related factors affect listener evaluations of L2 speech. This study examined responses of 201 raters from 23 first language (L1) backgrounds to the question of whether or not there are differences in male and female English L2 speaker comprehensibility. The results indicated that 66.7% perceived no difference, 27.9% judged female speakers to be easier to understand, and only 5.5% judged male speakers to be easier to understand. Written comments were coded and frequencies of codes compared in terms of rater sex and teaching experience. While overall likelihood of perceiving gender effects did not differ, the reasons given did. Male raters and teachers tended to reject gender differences on philosophical grounds, whereas students more often reported never noticing them. Among those who perceived gender differences, lower male voice pitch was seen as hindering intelligibility, while females were thought to make greater efforts at clarity and correction. Greater familiarity with female L2 speech was also cited, highlighting potential gender bias in listener judgments of comprehensibility. Based on these findings, implications and recommendations for ensuring fairness in L2 assessment are presented

CLARITY · First language · Gender bias · Perception · Second language · Speech perception · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Second Language Acquisition and Learning

  • Intelligibility of normal speech I

    Open Access•Ann Bradlow, Ann R Bradlow et al.•Speech Communication•1996

  • Morphology and development of the human vocal tract

    W Tecumseh Fitch, Jay N Giedd et al.•The Journal of the Acoustical…•1999

  • Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates' judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants

    Open Access•D L Rubin•Research in Higher Education•1992

  • The Chi-square test of independence

    Open Access•Mary L McHugh•Biochemia Medica•2013

  • Why do women more often intend to study abroad than men

    Open Access•Fine Cordua, Nicolai Netz•Higher Education•2022

  • Does a rater’s familiarity with a candidate’s pronunciation affect the rating in oral proficiency interviews

    Open Access•Michael Carey, Robert H Mannell et al.•Language Testing•2011

  • The impact of gender in oral proficiency testing

    Open Access•Kieran O’Loughlin•Language Testing•2002

  • Gender and stylistic variation in second language phonology

    Roy C Major•Language Variation and Change•2004

  • Gender and attitudes towards English varieties

    Open Access•Jim Yee Him Chan•System•2018

  • Exploring gender and oral proficiency interview performance

    Open Access•Barry O’Sullivan•System•2000

  • Motivation and gender in the Japanese EFL classroom

    Open Access•Setsuko Mori, Peter Göbel•System•2006

  • Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education

    Open Access•Jane Sunderland•Language Teaching•2000

  • Has socioeconomic development reduced the English divide? A statistical analysis of access to English skills in Japan

    Takunori Terasawa•Journal of Multilingual and…•2017

  • Bilinguals Produce Pitch Range Differently in Their Two Languages to Convey Social Meaning

    Open Access•Elisa Passoni, Edith De Leeuw et al.•Language and Speech•2022

  • Pitch, Politeness and Sexual Role

    Open Access•Leo Loveday•Language and Speech•1981

  • Sociocultural Aspects of Pitch Differences between Japanese and Dutch Women

    Open Access•Renée Van Bezooijen•Language and Speech•1995

  • Is What's Good for the Goose Good for the Gander? The Case of Male and Female Encouragement to Study French

    Open Access•Scott Kissau•Foreign Language Annals•2007

  • Phonetic differences between male and female speech

    Open Access•Adrian P Simpson, Adrian Simpson•Language and Linguistics Compass•2009

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae