Redefining assessment for sustainability
A reflective approach to curriculum transformation in environmental education
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22165752 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James Ojochenemi David (0000-0002-0338-7568, University of South Africa, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/feduc.2025.1553999 |
| OpenAlex | W4410379567 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 48 |
Background The urgency of sustainability challenges has reinforced the need for effective environmental education in higher education. However, certain assessment methods often fail to balance theoretical depth with individual accountability. The shift toward digital and hybrid learning post-COVID-19 further necessitates adaptive, student-centered assessment models. Objectives This study critically evaluates assessment practices within the Environmental Sustainability (EVST) module at a University of Technology in South Africa. It identifies key limitations in project-based assessments and proposes a revised framework integrating diverse formative and summative strategies to enhance engagement and real-world application. Methods Using Schön’s reflective practitioner model, the study draws on teaching experiences, collegial discussions, and professional development insights. It critiques past assessment methods and introduces an alternative approach based on formative and summative assessment theories, constructive alignment, and student-centered learning. The revised model incorporates technology-driven quizzes, individual essays, and structured group projects to provide a more balanced evaluation that takes cognizance of modern digital realities. Results The findings indicate that technology-driven quizzes enhance digital literacy and real-time feedback, individual essays improve research and analytical skills, and structured group projects foster collaboration while ensuring equitable participation. The revised model aligns with the university’s graduate attributes by promoting problem-solving, self-directed learning, and environmental responsibility. Conclusion This study underscores the need for continuous assessment refinement in environmental education, particularly in digital learning environments. By integrating adaptive assessment methods, educators can bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical sustainability action, fostering critical thinking and engagement. The proposed framework offers a model for curriculum transformation and future research on assessment strategies
Curriculum · Engineering ethics · Environmental education · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Pedagogy · Sociology · Sustainability · Computer Science · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Assessment and Pedagogy · Engineering · Engineering Education and Curriculum Development · Environmental Science
The Impact of Environmental Education Awareness on Somali Students’ Sustainability Practices
Activity-based organization of extracurricular work as a condition for competency development in future history teachers in Kazakhstan
Sustainability-aligned digital risks in South African higher education
Integrating Local Knowledge into Higher Education
Beyond the survey
Project-based assessment
Social Foundations of Thought and Action
Teaching Sustainability in European Higher Education Institutions
Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019
The reflective practitioner
Distance education challenges
Aligning the principles of assessment for learning to learning in physical education
Using blended learning in South African social work education to facilitate student engagement
Digital technologies and environmental education
A scoping review on the notions of Assessment as Learning (AaL), Assessment for Learning (AfL), and Assessment of Learning (AoL)
We agree on what we see
A Wake-Up Call
Assessment terms half a century in the making and unmaking
Decolonizing climate change response
Continuous assessment fit for purpose? Analysing the experiences of academics from a South African university of technology
Education for strategic environmental behavior
Authentic assessment of teaching in context
The Reflective Practitioner
Student Perceptions of Performance-Based Assessments for In-Person and Online Courses
A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 6 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |