Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Discursive characteristics of negative manipulative communicative demonstrativeness

Bibliographic Data

ID22181802
AuthorsIrina Tislenkova (0000-0002-7202-2773, Volgograd State Technical University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume30
Issue1
Pages167-174
Publication date2024-04-22
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueVestnik of Samara University History pedagogics philology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2542-0445 • E-ISSN: 2712-8946
PublisherSamara National Research University (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.18287/2542-0445-2024-30-1-167-174
OpenAlexW4395669356
LanguageEN
References cited5

The article is devoted to the concept definition of negative manipulative communicative demonstrativeness and the identification its implementation means in speech. In the course of the work, the interdisciplinary approach and the method of psycholinguistic analysis of the communicants’ speech output were used. The material for the analysis was the characters’ statements from Russian literature of the XIX century. It is established that the negative manipulative communicative demonstrativeness is a tonality of communication characterized by exaggerated negative self-presentation in the process of self-explanation, accentuation of the dominant destructive emotion, implemented to benefit from the recipient expressed by means of semiotic polymodality. The study shows that the negative manipulative communicative demonstrativeness performs attractive, expressive, influencing, entertaining, pragmatic and conative functions, implements communicative strategies of self-pity, outrage, foolishness, buffoonery, self-abasement and self-flagellation. Linguistic means of expressing this tonality are revealed: metaphorical litota, synecdoche with negative connotation, increasing negative gradation, intensifying particles-phraseological units of religious content, negative adjectives in a diminutive form, emotive interjections with the component «God», prayerful ritual utterances, rhetorical questions, antithesis (self-pity); paradox with negative connotative meaning, enhanced antithesis (shocking); negative hyperbolic tropes, reiteration, exclamation sentences (foolishness); hyperbolic comparison (buffoonery); negative epithets and prosodic units, including a quiet voice, speech with pressure, an elevated tone and frequent pausing (self-abasement); negative nouns, imperative sentences and cliched phrases with negative connotation (self-flagellation). The paralinguistic means of actualizing this tonality are indicated: phonational and kinetic demonstratives. The scientific novelty of the research is determined by the unexplored nature of the phenomenon under consideration

Linguistics · Communication · Education and Professional Development · Educational Methods and Teacher Development · Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies · Philosophy · Psychology

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae