Mark Goodacre’s The Case Against Q
A Retrospect Twenty-Two Years On
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22182651 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Phillip A Davis (0009-0006-1213-8551, University of Bonn, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 36-50 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | NTT Journal for Theology and the Study of Religion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2542-6583 • E-ISSN: 2590-3268 |
| Publisher | Amsterdam University Press (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.5117/ntt2024.1.003.davi |
| OpenAlex | W4393180830 |
| Language | EN |
As part of NTT JTSR’s series on Key Texts, the present article discusses Mark Goodacre’s influential work, The Case Against Q. The book challenges the standard solution to the synoptic problem, the two-document hypothesis, arguing against the existence of Q and for Luke’s use of Matthew. This article takes a critical look back at the book’s main arguments and examines the impact it has had on subsequent scholarship
Art · Art history · Academic integrity and plagiarism · History
| Highly cited | No |
|---|