Proportionate Universalism and Public Health

An Analysis of WRR Policy Brief From Disparity to Potential

Bibliographic Data

ID22182772
AuthorsChristoph Jedan (0000-0002-1562-951X, University of Groningen, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume75
Issue1
Pages73-93
Publication date2021-03-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueNTT Journal for Theology and the Study of Religion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2542-6583 • E-ISSN: 2590-3268
PublisherAmsterdam University Press (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.5117/ntt2021.1.005.jeda
OpenAlexW3123191396
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited6

The article analyses the public health policy brief From Disparity to Potential by the Dutch Scientific Council for Government Policy (WRR). It argues that the WRR brief presents a distinctive and novel brand of proportionate universalism, a theory proposed by Sir Michael Marmot (2010). The article situates the brief in the wider debate on proportionate universalism and offers an evaluation from an ethical perspective. It argues that the WRR’s version of proportionate universalism exhibits three flaws: (1) the definition of socio-economic status is unduly focused on education levels and thus ignores important, health-relevant disparities; (2) whilst the policy brief endorses subsidiarity, it remains focused on governmental and economic actors, ignoring the importance of voluntary associations such as churches and faith-based organizations; (3) the focus of proportionate universalism is quantitative and needs supplementing with theories of the good life, typically associated with theological and philosophical forms of ethics originating in the premodern era

Economics · Environmental ethics · Political science · Politics · Public policy · Sociology · Subsidiarity · Universalism · Child and Adolescent Health · Law · Philosophy · Public Administration · Public Health Policies and Education

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access