Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

“And what Do You Do, Exactly?” Comparing Contemporary Definitions and Practices of Applied History

Bibliographic Data

ID22187336
AuthorsBram De Ridder (University of Antwerp, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume5
Issue1
Pages29-41
Publication date2022-08-08
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Public History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2567-1111 • E-ISSN: 2567-1111
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/iph-2022-2038
OpenAlexW4285043887
LanguageEN
Citations received2

In the last few years, the notion of applied history has seen a notable rise in interest among historians. Arising out of questions related to contemporary concerns, such as political extremism and Covid-19, several projects have taken up the challenge to address these questions and other issues by looking to the past, thereby furthering the idea that applied history warrants the attention of professional (academic) historians. The concept of applied history itself is, however, not new, begging questions of how these new projects use the term and how this usage relates to older definitions and methods associated with the term. This article shows that much of the most recent ‘wave’ of applied history has tended to present itself as closely related to history and policy, distinguishing itself by either drawing a hard line between public and applied history or by ignoring public history altogether. On the other hand, some have defined applied history as an approach or sub-field of public history, sometimes leading public historians to assume that these new groups are merely, and unhelpfully, putting a new logo on an old brand. This article offers a thorough overview of these contending developments and argues that the current conceptual and methodological confusion about applied history is detrimental to anyone relying on the term. Essentially, when a non-historian seeks the assistance of an applied historian and asks the logical question “and what do you do, exactly?,” the current uncertainty can result in major and off-putting confusion about what the term actually means

Conceptual history · Confusion · Epistemology · Historical method · Intellectual history · Media studies · Political history · Political science · Politics · Public history · Social science · Sociology · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy · History · Law · Philosophy · Politics and Society in Latin America · Psychology · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies

  • A Public History of Monuments

    Open Access•Thomas Cauvin•Studies on National Movements•2022

  • Uses of the past” in applied history methodology

    Julie Wynant•Rethinking History•2025

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.5
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae