The impact of industry structure on the value of national logistics costs/gross domestic product
Evidence from China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22187744 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Zhaomin Zhang (0000-0002-8806-1849, Shenzhen Polytechnic University), Yanhua Li (0000-0001-8972-503X, Renmin University of China) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 8593 |
| Publication date | 2024-09-29 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2572-7923 • E-ISSN: 2572-7931 |
| Publisher | EnPress Publisher (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.24294/jipd.v8i10.8593 |
| OpenAlex | W4402962237 |
| Language | EN |
The proportion of national logistics costs to Gross Domestic Product (NLC/GDP) serve as a valuable indicator for estimating a country’s overall macro-level logistics costs. In some developing nations, policies aimed at reducing the NLC/GDP ratio have been elevated to the national agenda. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of research examining the variables that can determine this ratio. The purpose of this paper is to offer a scientific approach for investigating the primary determinants of the NLC/GDP and to advice policy for the reduction of macro-level logistics costs. This paper presents a systematic framework for identifying the essential criteria for lowering the NLC/GDP score and employs co-integration analysis and error correction models to evaluate the impact of industrial structure, logistics commodity value, and logistics supply scale on NLC/GDP using time series data from 1991 to 2022 in China. The findings suggest that the industrial structure is the primary factor influencing logistics demand and a significant determinant of the value of NLC/GDP. Whether assessing long-term or short-term effects, the industrial structure has a substantial impact on NLC/GDP compared to logistics supply scale and logistics commodity value. The research offers two policy implications: firstly, the goals of reducing NLC/GDP and boosting the logistics industry’s GDP are inherently incompatible; it is not feasible to simultaneously enhance the logistics industry’s GDP and decrease the macro logistics cost. Secondly, if China aims to lower its macro-level logistics costs, it must make corresponding adjustments to its industrial structure
Business · China · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Gross domestic product · Gross margin · Industrial organization · Statistics · Global trade and economics · Maritime Ports and Logistics · Mathematics · Transport and Economic Policies · Finance
| Highly cited | No |
|---|