STI or DUI modes of innovation
Evidence from comprehensive evaluation of four cities in China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22189406 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Honghui Deng (0000-0002-5549-623X, Shenzhen Polytechnic University), Bo Chen (0009-0009-0184-3556, Dongguan University of Technology), Weixin Zhai (0000-0002-5507-6593) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 13 |
| Pages | 9748 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-14 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2572-7923 • E-ISSN: 2572-7931 |
| Publisher | EnPress Publisher (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.24294/jipd9748 |
| OpenAlex | W4404314061 |
| Language | EN |
The Science and Technology Innovation Center holds a pivotal position in the national science and technology innovation system, and a scientific evaluation of the “Sci-tech Innovation Center” will guide its construction direction. This study found the advantages and disadvantages of the four cities through comparison; Hence improvement suggestions were proposed for the weaknesses of the four cities. There are two main paths for the government to drive technology innovation: STI (Science and Technology Innovation) mode and DUI (Doing, Using, Interacting) mode. With the aid of the evaluation index system of the Sci-tech Innovation Center, this article uses fuzzy sets, rough sets and fuzzy dynamic clustering methods to comprehensively evaluate the effects of driving technology innovation in the four cities of Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Guangzhou. The results found that Shenzhen has a significant effect in DUI, and Beijing has a significant effect in STI. The choice of path is related to the abundance of innovation resources
Business · China · Political science · Transport engineering · Engineering · Innovation and Knowledge Management · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
| Highly cited | No |
|---|