The influence of community economic development and peat area governance on Society 5.0
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22189549 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mayarni Mayarni (0000-0002-4487-0919, Riau University), Almasdi Syahza (0000-0003-1714-2104, Riau University), Sofyan H Siregar, Amrul Khoiri (Riau University), Eka Hariyani (0000-0003-2905-6289, Riau University), Mimin Sundari Nasution (0009-0006-3495-1578, Riau University), Andri SULISTYANI (0000-0001-8051-1625, Riau University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 1843 |
| Publication date | 2023-08-18 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2572-7923 • E-ISSN: 2572-7931 |
| Publisher | EnPress Publisher (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.24294/jipd.v7i2.1843 |
| OpenAlex | W4385986123 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
This article is a study of the institutional governance of farmers in Bukit Batu District, Bengkalis Regency using the concept of Society 5.0 and the governance paradigm for analysis in peat area studies. This study aims to determine the form of institutional governance of smallholder agriculture in peat areas and determine the truth of the influence of community economic management and development indicators on Society 5.0, which results from empirical studies in the field. This study uses the mixed methods method, which combines quantitative and qualitative data analysis to measure the truth of information. The results of the study illustrate that the question study first finds existing forms of institutional governance walk, however still passive; this is caused by constraints of knowledge management plant horticulture in the region peat, utilization process nutrients, and management techniques group sustainable farming in aspect regulation government and empowerment company around through CSR; on the question, it has been furthermore found that management variables and community economic development have a positive influence on Society 5.0. This study uses quantitative analysis and calculation results from the SPSS analysis test to support this conclusion. From this study, it formulated recommendation from the synergy between economic development and management of peat areas to socio-economic and environmental impacts that must be considered by interested stakeholders, as well as maximizing function technology in making it easy to manage horticulture plants in peat areas as a form of Society 5.0 to minimize behind
Agriculture · Business · Corporate governance · Economic growth · Economics · Empowerment · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Good governance · Peat · Political science · Sustainable development · Agricultural and Environmental Management · Agricultural Development and Management · SMEs Development and Digital Marketing
| Highly cited | No |
|---|