Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Applying MCDM to evaluate benchmark scores in the logistics sector for the period 2021–2023

Application to universities in Vietnam

Bibliographic Data

ID22189610
AuthorsVo Thi Nhu Uyen (Hanoi University of Industry), Nazlı ERSOY (0000-0003-0011-2216, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University), Do Duc Trung (0000-0002-3190-1026, Hanoi University of Industry), Nguyen Thi Phuong Giang (0009-0005-2537-3801, Hanoi University of Science and Technology)
Year2024
Volume8
Issue11
Pages8942
Publication date2024-10-22
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Infrastructure Policy and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2572-7923 • E-ISSN: 2572-7931
PublisherEnPress Publisher (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.24294/jipd.v8i11.8942
OpenAlexW4403592199
LanguageEN

Choosing a university is a crucial decision for each field of study, as it significantly influences the quality of graduates. An important factor in this decision is the university’s annual benchmark scores. The benchmark score represents the minimum score required for admission. This study evaluates the benchmark scores in the logistics sector for several prominent universities in Vietnam during the period 2021–2023. The research process utilized data on the benchmark scores for the years 2021, 2022, and 2023. The weights of these benchmark scores were calculated using the Rank Order Centroid (ROC) method, and the Probability method was employed to compare the benchmark scores of the universities. The analysis identified C3 as the criterion with the highest importance, while U3 emerged as the top-ranked alternative. The two-stage comprehensive sensitivity analysis revealed that universities consistently ranked high or low regardless of the method used to calculate benchmark score weights or the method employed for ranking. Additionally, the smallest weight change that affected the overall Probability ranking was 4.61%. This study provides significant guidance for students in selecting a university for logistics studies and serves as a foundational reference for universities to assess their capabilities in logistics education, thereby fostering healthy competition among institutions

Business · Cartography · Engineering management · Geography · Multiple-criteria decision analysis · Operations management · Operations research · Competency Development and Evaluation · Engineering · Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation · Quality and Supply Management

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae