Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Examining the Role of Digital Technology in Shaping Modern Social Movements

Bibliographic Data

ID22201007
AuthorsKiran Saroj (Fugro (Norway)), Mohon Rongphar (Government of India), Tanvi Mallick (Serampore College), Tridisha Bayan (Assam Down Town University), Subrat Chetia (0009-0009-6778-6240, Kanya Maha Vidyalaya), Mood Naresh (JRE Group of Institutions)
Year2026
Volume6
Issue1
Pages226-231
Publication date2026-01-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueIntegrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2583-1712 • E-ISSN: 2583-1712
PublisherStallion Publication (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.55544/ijrah.6.1.34
OpenAlexW7130833322
LanguageEN
References cited16

The increased spread of digital technology has significantly transformed the character, the extent, and the course of contemporary social movements. During the past twenty years, digital media in the form of social media networks, mobile communication technologies, online forums and digital advocacy tools become the key modes in which collective action is coordinated, maintained, and amplified. In this paper, I explore the complex nature of the digital technology in the formation of contemporary social movements, with attention to its impact on the process of mobilization, organizational forms, identity development, political action, and outcome of the movements. In comparison to the old social movements where gathering physically, use of print press and top-down leadership hierarchy were the main pillars of operation, modern movements are slowly shifting to digitally networked setting that is fast, decentralized, and transnational. It takes a qualitative and exploratory research method based on a thorough review of the literature available and a comparison of case studies. The paper presents a case study of the Arab Spring, the BlackLivesMatter movement, as well as similar youth-led movements focused on climate change and shows how digital tools can be used to spread information quickly, reduce entry barriers, and allow marginalized voices to be heard. Through the digital technology, individuals have become active contributors of information rather than passive receivers of life and have democratized communication in politics, thus questioning established power bases. Nevertheless, the paper critically questions the constraints and dangers of digital activism, as well. The problem of misinformation, the biases of algorithms, online surveillance, harassment in the Internet, and the ongoing digital differences are all significant questions of the sustainability and inclusivity of digitally mediated movements. Digital platforms increase visibility and short-term mobilization, but they do not necessarily have a long-term structural change and policy reform. The trend of slacktivism and susceptibility of movements to state oppression and takeover by corporate platforms are discussed as the most critical issues. This paper results indicate that digital technology is an enabling infrastructure and not a solution to social change. The best social movements are the ones which cleverly combine digital with offline organizing, institutional mobilization, and collective action which is sustained. This study provides a balanced and critical analysis that can be used to further discussions on the topic of digital activism, and the emergent technologies can further influence how social movements develop in the future in the ever-interconnected world

Digital media · Digital transformation · Information and Communications Technology · Social media · Social movement · Community and Sustainable Development · Social Media and Politics · Sociopolitical Dynamics in Nepal

  • Democracy’s Fourth Wave?

    Philip N Howard, Muzammil Hussain et al.•Democracy's Fourth Wave?•2013

  • Affective Publics

    Zizi Papacharissi•Affective publics•2014

  • Tweets and the Streets

    Paolo Gerbaudo•Tweets and the Streets•2012

  • Digitally Enabled Social Change

    Jennifer Earl, Katrina Kimport•Digitally enabled social change•2011

  • The Logic of Connective Action

    Open Access•W L Bennett, Alexandra Segerberg•Logic of Connective Action•2013

  • Occupy Wall Street on the Public Screens of Social Media: The Many Framings of the Birth of a Protest Movement

    Open Access•Kevin Michael Deluca, Sean Lawson et al.•Communication Culture and Critique•2012

  • Using Twitter to mobilize protest action

    Yannis Theocharis, Wendell Lowe et al.•Information Communication & Society•2015

  • Internet and Social Movement Action Repertoires

    Jeroen Van Laer, Peter Van Aelst•Information Communication & Society•2010

  • Networking Democracy

    Brian D Loader, Dan Mercea•Information Communication & Society•2011

  • Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere

    Open Access•Jeffrey S Juris•American Ethnologist•2012

  • Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements

    Open Access•Sidney Tarrow, Donatella Della Porta et al.•Comparative Perspectives on…•1996

  • Big Data from the South(s)

    Open Access•Milan, Emiliano Treré•Television & New Media•2019

  • Social Media

    Catherine Fuchs, Christian Fuchs•Social Media•2014

  • Social media and protest mobilization

    Anita Breuer, Todd Landman et al.•Democratization•2015

  • The Logic of Connective Action

    W L Bennett, Alexandra Segerberg•Information Communication & Society•2012

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae