Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Contemporary Russian Europeanism as a "Marginal" Political Tradition and a Historiographic Grand Narrative

Bibliographic Data

ID22201768
AuthorsM V Kirchanov (corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume6
Issue2
Pages208-216
Publication date2022-06-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueВестник Удмуртского университета Социология Политология Международные отношения (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2587-6163 • E-ISSN: 2587-9030
PublisherUdmurt State University (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.35634/2587-9030-2022-6-2-208-216
OpenAlexW4285009330
LanguageEN

The author analyses the development features of Europeanism as an invented political tradition and historiographic grand narrative in Russian intellectual history. It is assumed that modern Russian Europeanism is related to the cultural traditions of Russian Westernisation genetically, as well as the reforms of the 1990s, when the political elites of Russia had pro-Western sympathies. The author perceives Europeanism as a number of heterogeneous intellectual phenomena. The author believes that historical and literary academic studies became the main form of the history and functioning of Russian Europeanism in the 2000s and 2010s. It is assumed that the Russian intellectual communities of historians, philologists and literary critics exist in a state of institutionalised dependence on the Western European model of humanitarian knowledge. The article shows that Russian Europeanism has two forms: firstly, the desire of Russian intellectuals to write the history of Russia in the European system of coordinates, “imagining” and “inventing” it as a European one; secondly, the refusal of some of them to analyse Russian problems as ideologically and politically motivated a priori. The author analyses attempts to Europeanise the Russian historical process as invented traditions in contexts of alternative historiographic interpretations. It is assumed that the European perception of the historical process became one of the historiographic grand narratives. The author believes that Russian Europeanism had significant cultural and intellectual potential, but it was unable to actualize its adaptive potential in competition with alternative ideological trends, including various versions of the left (communist) and right (nationalist) ideologies. Therefore, contemporary Russian Europeanism is not institutionalised and does not have a formal organisational structure. The author believes that the national intellectual communities, unlike the Russian ones, have not lost interest in the European idea yet, which guarantee the further development of Europeanism in Russia, but in substantially different forms

Communism · Economic history · Historiography · Ideology · Intellectual history · Literature · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Global Political and Economic Relations · History · Law · Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation · Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae