Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Negotiating generative artificial intelligence in animal rights activism

A qualitative study in Türkiye

Bibliographic Data

ID22203214
AuthorsŞeyma Esin Erben (0000-0002-9984-1242, University of Malta, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume13
Pages102843
Publication date2026-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Sciences & Humanities Open (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2590-2911 • E-ISSN: 2590-2911
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102843
OpenAlexW7156189832
LanguageEN
References cited20

This phenomenological study examines how animal rights activists in Türkiye understand and engage with generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI). The research is based on semi-structured interviews with seventeen activists and ten months of digital observation. Thematic analysis generated three themes: ethical and value-based compatibility, practical applications in activism, and effectiveness and accessibility. Activists often relied on Gen AI to sustain campaign communication during periods of intensified mobilisation, while continuing to question its ethical compatibility and uneven accessibility. The study conceptualises activists’ engagement with Gen AI as an ongoing negotiation shaped by ethical concerns and practical demands. • Activists continue engaging with generative AI amid ethical tensions. • Anthropocentric defaults in Gen AI outputs conflict with anti -speciesist values. • Time pressure and accessibility sustain routinised Gen AI engagement. • Gen AI supports campaign content production and visual mobilisation. • Engagement unfolds as an ongoing ethical–practical negotiation

Generative grammar · Negotiation · Qualitative analysis · Qualitative research · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Law, AI, and Intellectual Property

  • From MilkingBots to RoboDolphins

    Open Access•Leonie Bossert, Leonie N Bossert et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Evaluating the determinants of Metaverse learning benefits in higher education

    Open Access•Shaofeng Wang, Hao Zhang•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2025

  • Decolonial AI

    Open Access•Shakir Mohamed, Marie-Therese Png et al.•Philosophy & Technology•2020

  • Generative artificial intelligence and the risk of technodigital colonialism

    Open Access•Leonardo Cambraia, Monique Pyrrho•Frontiers in Political Science•2025

  • Black feminism and Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Laura Schelenz•Frontiers in Sociology•2025

  • Multiperspectival designs and processes in interpretative phenomenological analysis research

    Open Access•Michael Larkin, R Shaw et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2018

  • Shaping feminist artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Sophie Toupin•New Media & Society•2023

  • The corporate cultivation of digital resignation

    Open Access•Nora A Draper, Joseph Turow•New Media & Society•2019

  • The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon

    Jan Van Dijk, Kenneth L Hacker et al.•The Information Society•2003

  • Geographies of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Monica A Walker, Margath Walker et al.•Human Geography•2023

  • Embedding Societal Values into Social Media Algorithms

    Open Access•Michael S Bernstein, Michael Bernstein et al.•Journal of Online Trust and Safety•2023

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • What Is Agency

    Mustafa Emirbayer, Ann Mische•American Journal of Sociology•1998

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae